M max2 macrumors 603 Original poster May 31, 2015 6,446 2,051 Oct 18, 2017 #1 Firefox 56.0.1 with a process for each tab. Really helps on YouTube. Plus if a tab crashes. Also memory usage is higher but once I close a tab I get the memory back so that is a huge advantage!
Firefox 56.0.1 with a process for each tab. Really helps on YouTube. Plus if a tab crashes. Also memory usage is higher but once I close a tab I get the memory back so that is a huge advantage!
eyoungren macrumors Nehalem Aug 31, 2011 30,418 30,187 Oct 18, 2017 #2 You may be interested in Waterfox. https://www.waterfoxproject.org/
M max2 macrumors 603 Original poster May 31, 2015 6,446 2,051 Oct 18, 2017 #3 eyoungren said: You may be interested in Waterfox. https://www.waterfoxproject.org/ Click to expand... No thanks it will be left behind once Firefox 57 releases.
eyoungren said: You may be interested in Waterfox. https://www.waterfoxproject.org/ Click to expand... No thanks it will be left behind once Firefox 57 releases.
eyoungren macrumors Nehalem Aug 31, 2011 30,418 30,187 Oct 18, 2017 #4 max2 said: No thanks it will be left behind once Firefox 57 releases. Click to expand... You think so huh? I wonder why the dev of Waterfox bothers updating then.
max2 said: No thanks it will be left behind once Firefox 57 releases. Click to expand... You think so huh? I wonder why the dev of Waterfox bothers updating then.
M max2 macrumors 603 Original poster May 31, 2015 6,446 2,051 Oct 18, 2017 #5 eyoungren said: You think so huh? I wonder why the dev of Waterfox bothers updating then. Click to expand... So people who like old XUL Firefox addons can still use them! I use to have a lot of XUL Firefox addons but moved on to alternative web extensions for the same addon. Granted I couldn't get a alternative for ever single one but most of them.
eyoungren said: You think so huh? I wonder why the dev of Waterfox bothers updating then. Click to expand... So people who like old XUL Firefox addons can still use them! I use to have a lot of XUL Firefox addons but moved on to alternative web extensions for the same addon. Granted I couldn't get a alternative for ever single one but most of them.
J Jamovik macrumors member Oct 18, 2010 39 13 Oct 18, 2017 #6 How? And when do Mozilla plan to build this in natively?