Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
69,078
40,115



58938cf7dd0895cb6e8b47a5-337-250x250.jpeg
Apple has hired a former Spotify executive to head up its Apple Music label relations team, according to Business Insider.

An Apple spokesperson confirmed that former Spotify VP of content Steve Savoca has been recruited to oversee the music streaming service's global label relations, which work out of New York.

Savoca is tasked with building relationships with smaller, independent labels, with a focus on the international scene, according to the report.

Savoca is said to have haven been one of Spotify's first U.S. employees and worked for the Swedish streaming company for five years. Prior to that, he held senior digital and marketing roles roles at Domino Records, Zomba Label Group, and London-Sire.

Savoca is a musician himself, and played drums with a band called the Werefrogs during the 1990s, according to Billboard. He serves on the board of directors of the Music Business Association (formerly NARM) and previously sat on the board at Merlin.

In December 2016, Apple's Eddy Cue revealed that Apple Music has over 20 million paid subscribers. In October, Spotify said it had 40 million subscribers. Apple Music executive Jimmy Iovine recently spoke of the company's desire to make Apple Music more than just a music streaming service, with "an entire pop cultural experience" planned that takes in original content including TV and audio.

Article Link: Former Spotify Executive Hired to Lead Apple Music's Label Relations
 
No. You do it by being the biggest company in the world and entering into a new domain with every bit of weight your multibillion-dollar corpus can offer.

Yeah, too bad that didn't work exactly well for Google's, Microsoft's and Amazon's music subscription services. Nowhere close to Apple's >20M subscribers.

Maybe because they're not technically "the biggest company in the world" by your logic.
 
I dropped Apple Music in favor of Spotify last month. I really like Spotify's various playlists and their recommendations. The UI can use some improvement but I still like it better than Apple's (they display the album's year!)
 
I dropped Apple Music in favor of Spotify last month. I really like Spotify's various playlists and their recommendations. The UI can use some improvement but I still like it better than Apple's (they display the album's year!)

My fiancée and I went on the Spotify family plan about 4 months ago. While Apple Music wasn't bad when I had it, I really enjoy the robust playlists that Spotify offers (also the user curated playlists are great). I agree their UI could use some updating, but until I see or hear Apple Music improve, I will stick with Spotify for the time being.
 
Finally, somebody with experience.

Hopefully he'll help Apple understand what the consumers want.

Random guessing hasn't worked too well.

Can't tell if that's sarcasm.
20 Million Subscribers. Already half of Spotify (that has been around for 10 years).
 
Finally, somebody with experience.

Hopefully he'll help Apple understand what the consumers want.

Random guessing hasn't worked too well.
I guess "Label Relation" is not related to music app development or design. Apple just want to gather more labels, especially indie labels under its huge empire.
 
I gave up with Apple Music and almost given up iTines as well I'm astonished there is no CD quality and above option. I use iTunes as a player for HiRes music bought elsewhere but i purchase very little now from the store.
 
I tried Apple Music for a full year, and while I did find it to be pretty good, I'd rather own my music. I spent almost $200 on streaming services (GPM/AM/Spotify) and I found a bunch of music I liked but then I cancelled and lost it, making me rebuy the music.

Personally I'd rather just pay for my music as I want it rather than have an entire catalog that I can download and listen to as much as I want but then have it completely removed once I decide to cancel service.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rhoydotp
Yeah, too bad that didn't work exactly well for Google's, Microsoft's and Amazon's music subscription services. Nowhere close to Apple's >20M subscribers.

Maybe because they're not technically "the biggest company in the world" by your logic.

Nope , they others you mentioned did not spam thier users on a daily basis to try the service ;)

Apple also has a very high software upgrade rate, see first sentence .

Though try to be rationale , google Microsoft and amazon in no way committed to a music service like apple did. It's like saying Microsoft was competing with the Apple Watch with the Microsoft band....no no no ...
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.