I did a few searches and didn't see this here. This was too entertaining not to post.
"Julian Assange Frivolously Sued by Inane Person"
In my line of work I see some poorly written suits, this guy must be their leader. Filing pro se is ballsy when you cannot spell "Nucliar" correctly.
"Julian Assange Frivolously Sued by Inane Person"
A man in Florida is suing the Wikileaks founder, alleged sexual deviant, and international man of mystery Julian Assange. The reason for the suit? "Serious personan injury" (sic) due to living in "fear of being on the brink of Nucliar WAR" (sic). The sum? 150 million "dollors" (sic).
Depression? Stress? Fear of a stroke? Clarity Law Blog explains what this suit (PDF) actually means for the impish data disseminator (and other targets of similarly frivolous lawsuits):
Should Assange laugh and ignore the lawsuit? It depends. Filing a claim is a two-step process. First, Crazyman files with the clerk of court (4 mistyped pages and ~$200), and then he has to serve the court papers on Assange. Even if Assange reads about Crazyman online, American requirements for due process arent satisfied until the written complaint is physically delivered to Assangeno easy task. (In the movies, a fake FedEx person saunters up and asks, Hey man, can you sign for this package?) To bring in WikiLeaks itself as a defendant, Crazyman has to serve WikiLeaks (nonexistent) registered agent.
If Crazyman succeeds in serving process on Assange, Assange must respond. If he doesnt, a default judgment will be enteredits just like forfeiting a softball match. Once Crazyman has a default judgment in hand, he can go after Assanges U.S. bank accounts (now or in the future). Banks dont care if the claim is ridiculous; a court order is a court order.
In my line of work I see some poorly written suits, this guy must be their leader. Filing pro se is ballsy when you cannot spell "Nucliar" correctly.