Hi all:
I have iStat Pro 4.2 installed on my 2.4Ghz SR MBP. I am running 10.4.10 with 4 gigs of RAM. I keep my laptop on all the time and just put it to sleep inbetween active use. iStat Pro has shown that my "free" memory goes as low as 190 megs over time, with the "inactive" memory hovering between 2-3 gigs.
Just for kicks I shut it down and rebooted; the "free" memory jumped up to 3.2 gigs; I'm currently monitoring it after opening and closing various apps to see what happens to it.
I looked on the islayer website but the istat manaul doesn't say what the difference is between free and inactive memory with respects to performance; just that iStat differentiates the two. They do mention that inactive memory is sent back to cache while free RAM is just unused. However I'm not sure what that all means.
Is a loss of "free" memory over time indicative of a memory leak in OS X, or is it completely irrelevant and unused RAM (Free and inactive) is all the same thing?
BTW: I haven't noticed any perceptible performance hit over time with repeated sleeps.
Thanks
I have iStat Pro 4.2 installed on my 2.4Ghz SR MBP. I am running 10.4.10 with 4 gigs of RAM. I keep my laptop on all the time and just put it to sleep inbetween active use. iStat Pro has shown that my "free" memory goes as low as 190 megs over time, with the "inactive" memory hovering between 2-3 gigs.
Just for kicks I shut it down and rebooted; the "free" memory jumped up to 3.2 gigs; I'm currently monitoring it after opening and closing various apps to see what happens to it.
I looked on the islayer website but the istat manaul doesn't say what the difference is between free and inactive memory with respects to performance; just that iStat differentiates the two. They do mention that inactive memory is sent back to cache while free RAM is just unused. However I'm not sure what that all means.
Is a loss of "free" memory over time indicative of a memory leak in OS X, or is it completely irrelevant and unused RAM (Free and inactive) is all the same thing?
BTW: I haven't noticed any perceptible performance hit over time with repeated sleeps.
Thanks