Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

fraeone

macrumors regular
Original poster
Sep 26, 2003
219
9
Seattle, WA
I have been having the hardest time deciding what my new Mac is going to be--The 12" PBs look very tempting, but then it ocurred to me that the ibook could be had w/ a processor that was clocked just 10% slower. So I guess the real question is - how big of a difference is there between a G3 and a G4 at similar clockspeeds?

fraeone
 
I just sold an iBook 800 and hot a 12" PB 1Ghz, and even though there is a 200Mhz difference there, I can tell you that there is a noticable difference. In everything from web surfing to launch times of apps, the PB is light years better. I even have less RAM in the PB than I had in the iBook. Personally, I would tell you to go with the PB if you can afford it.

Regards,
Gus
 
Thanks Gus. I suspected it might be that way. Oh well, that's just another reason to go for the PB :) I also have a 802.11G network at home, so the iBook would have been underpowered with it's regular airport too.

Thanks again,

fraeone
 
OS X, as well as many apps are optimized to use Altivec, a technology which is only on the G4, not the G3. Because of this you should see significantly better performance despite the small difference in MHz.
 
Originally posted by Dont Hurt Me
g4 all the way, period. i hope apple rids ibook of g3 and throws in a 1 gig g4 soon.

Exactly.
It will be a memorable day when the slowest proc of an Apple computer will be a 1 GHz G4. (OK, maybe the G3 + AltiVec.. 750 GX?)
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.