Sidebar Sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

G5 1.8 Xbecnch Results

iJon

iJon

macrumors 604
Original poster
Feb 7, 2002
6,590
236
Results 123.30
System Info
Xbench Version 1.1
System Version 10.2.7
Physical RAM 512 MB
Model PowerMac7,2
Processor PowerPC 970 @ 1.80 GHz
L1 Cache 64K (instruction), 32K (data)
L2 Cache 512K @ 1800 MHz
Bus Frequency 900 MHz
Video Card GeForce FX 5200
Drive Type ST3160023AS
CPU Test 71.79
GCD Recursion 71.57 2.80 Mops/sec
Floating Point Basic 210.48 748.54 Mflop/sec
AltiVec Basic 77.23 1.12 Gflop/sec
vecLib FFT 29.30 451.58 Mflop/sec
Floating Point Library 259.53 10.39 Mops/sec
Thread Test 83.45
Computation 64.48 519.47 Kops/sec, 4 threads
Lock Contention 118.21 1.48 Mlocks/sec, 4 threads
Memory Test 245.05
System 184.88
Allocate 312.76 105.45 Kalloc/sec
Fill 131.66 1048.05 MB/sec
Copy 184.01 920.05 MB/sec
Stream 363.29
Copy 361.83 1475.61 MB/sec [G5]
Scale 339.00 1408.26 MB/sec [G5]
Add 376.60 1589.20 MB/sec [G5]
Triad 378.56 1558.09 MB/sec [G5]
Quartz Graphics Test 165.87
Line 187.15 4.76 Klines/sec [50% alpha]
Rectangle 172.63 12.14 Krects/sec [50% alpha]
Circle 182.49 4.21 Kcircles/sec [50% alpha]
Bezier 157.73 1.71 Kbeziers/sec [50% alpha]
Text 139.11 2.27 Kchars/sec
OpenGL Graphics Test 205.34
Spinning Squares 205.34 143.69 frames/sec
User Interface Test 148.19
Elements 148.19 50.42 refresh/sec
Disk Test 109.52
Sequential 114.17
Uncached Write 140.58 55.96 MB/sec [4K blocks]
Uncached Write 136.36 53.23 MB/sec [256K blocks]
Uncached Read 78.24 12.39 MB/sec [4K blocks]
Uncached Read 128.11 51.76 MB/sec [256K blocks]
Random 105.22
Uncached Write 99.97 1.43 MB/sec [4K blocks]
Uncached Write 108.36 24.44 MB/sec [256K blocks]
Uncached Read 100.08 0.66 MB/sec [4K blocks]
Uncached Read 113.76 23.41 MB/sec [256K blocks]

iJon
 
i have posted this before but what the heck, a 1.4 single g4 in my 733 with 10.2.6 and 1 gig of mem received a xbench of 114. for comparison purpose if anyone is interested and thanks to ijon for the post.
 
Here's someones... Dual 1.42 G4

131.03

System Info
Xbench Version
1.1
System Version
10.2.6
Physical RAM
512 MB
Model
PowerMac3,6
Processor
PowerPC G4x2 @ 1.42 GHz
Version
7455 (Apollo) v3.3
L1 Cache
32K (instruction), 32K (data)
L2 Cache
256K @ 1417 MHz
L3 Cache
2048K @ 237 MHz
Bus Frequency
167 MHz
Video Card
ATY,RV250 (ATI Radeon 9000)
Drive Type
ST3120024A
CPU Test
89.86
GCD Recursion
176.91
6.91 Mops/sec
Floating Point Basic
176.43
627.45 Mflop/sec
AltiVec Basic
175.94
2.56 Gflop/sec
vecLib FFT
30.30
466.96 Mflop/sec
Floating Point Library
177.44
7.10 Mops/sec
Thread Test
169.41
Computation
169.67
1.37 Mops/sec, 4 threads
Lock Contention
169.15
2.12 Mlocks/sec, 4 threads
Memory Test
164.24
System
187.27
Allocate
176.62
59.55 Kalloc/sec
Fill
334.12—>
2659.61 MB/sec
Copy
135.77
678.85 MB/sec
Stream
146.26
Copy
146.54
597.61 MB/sec [altivec]
Scale
148.69
617.68 MB/sec [altivec]
Add
149.82
632.21 MB/sec [altivec]
Triad
140.36
577.70 MB/sec [altivec]
Quartz Graphics Test
158.74
Line
159.52
4.06 Klines/sec [50% alpha]
Rectangle
133.27
9.38 Krects/sec [50% alpha]
Circle
175.73
4.05 Kcircles/sec [50% alpha]
Bezier
172.51
1.87 Kbeziers/sec [50% alpha]
Text
160.29
2.61 Kchars/sec
OpenGL Graphics Test
138.90
Spinning Squares
138.90
97.20 frames/sec
User Interface Test
161.19
Elements
161.19
54.85 refresh/sec
Disk Test
94.33
Sequential
109.13
Uncached Write
104.76
41.71 MB/sec [4K blocks]
Uncached Write
104.19
40.67 MB/sec [256K blocks]
Uncached Read
130.72
20.69 MB/sec [4K blocks]
Uncached Read
101.40
40.97 MB/sec [256K blocks]
Random
83.07
Uncached Write
58.19
0.83 MB/sec [4K blocks]
Uncached Write
93.32
21.05 MB/sec [256K blocks]
Uncached Read
95.64
0.63 MB/sec [4K blocks]
Uncached Read
102.13
21.02 MB/sec [256K blocks]
 
xBench

I think xBench is full of crap when using the G5. It just doesn't seem to be that a single 1.4GHz G4 can just barely be slower then a 1.8GHz G5,
 
Originally posted by Dont Hurt Me
i have posted this before but what the heck, a 1.4 single g4 in my 733 with 10.2.6 and 1 gig of mem received a xbench of 114. for comparison purpose if anyone is interested and thanks to ijon for the post.
Click to expand...

Ooops... sorry, Don't Hurt Me. Didn't pay enough attention..... :(
 
the g4 has a l3 the g5 dont, what i would like to see are frame rates of our favorite games, now that will tell the story. the dual machine is way ahead but the singles are not and this shows it. i think apple should have had 1 single and 2 duallies. anyways apple wont have to worry about moto' stagnation anymore.
 
Originally posted by Dont Hurt Me
the g4 has a l3 the g5 dont, what i would like to see are frame rates of our favorite games, now that will tell the story. the dual machine is way ahead but the singles are not and this shows it. i think apple should have had 1 single and 2 duallies. anyways apple wont have to worry about moto' stagnation anymore.
Click to expand...

Quoting you again here...

I totally agree. The difference between a Single 1.6 and Dual 2.0 GHz G5 is enormous... Personally I would have like to have seen the Dual 1.8 Ghz G5 alongside the single 1.8.
I have a Dual 1.25 GHz G4 now, and getting a single 1.8 GHz G5 doesn't seem such a leap. I know about the FSB, S-ATA, and so on, but still.... no L3 cache... no Dual..... <errrr... not even VPC :D >
 
this is gonna be sold soon im gonna put panther on here tomorrow (7b49) and see how it performs. as for my thoughts on the powermac, its huge when you walk up to it, but then after playing with it a while. things do feel real snappy with just everyday things like clicking and stuff, and this only has the base amount of ram. i cant see why anyone would leave the side door on. i really like the window because the inside of this computer is very eye pleasing. fans are quiet. it also wouldnt be hard at all to put a light in this thing. it could fit at least a foot long cold cathode tube, run it to the back of the case, behind the motherboard up the case and come out the hold with the 4 pin power connector and share it with the cd rom. all in all, a beatiful machine, if there are any questions let me know, this is a demo model "I" am in control of so i can do anything I want, just let me know.

iJon
 
Originally posted by adamfilip
Please iJon the PS7bench advanced test..
Click to expand...
explain to me what needs to be done, is this a program i keep hearing about?

edit: well im leaving in about 10 minutes and i have way to much homework tonight to come back and play, ill come by tomorrow after school and do whatever you want, pictures, movies, you name it i can do it...i think :)

iJon
 
Originally posted by iJon
if there are any questions let me know, this is a demo model "I" am in control of so i can do anything I want, just let me know.

iJon
Click to expand...

Get the frame rates of UT2003 and Quake 3 at varying resolutions please. :)

Thanks.
 
Originally posted by Freg3000
Get the frame rates of UT2003 and Quake 3 at varying resolutions please. :)

Thanks.
Click to expand...
well i dont have ut2003, i have the discs though, but if someone can send me a crack to install and try i will, testing purposes only ;) Quake i believe i can do. I can also Warcraft 3, but we all know that will run more than fine on this computer. umm i have RTCW and thats all i can think of now. UT2003 is probably the only one you guys care about. PM with the crack if you have one.

edit: another cool thing, when you turn this computer to sleep EVERYTHING turns off, fans and everything, real cool. then when you turn it on its like a car, fans rev up and slow back down and then you cant hear anything again.

iJon
 
Originally posted by adamfilip
how long does it take to boot?
Click to expand...
havent tried, but please rack up the questions, at 430 CTS i will answer all your questions.

iJon
 
Wow, nice man.

Nice.

xBench sucks now, such a varying in scores... bah!

Get some quake or something...

iJon you can also test the demo...

Or... You have a Private message.
 
strange.... I got a 126 on Xbench 1.1 on a 1.6GHz G5 w/ 256MB of RAM.

Sorry no specifics, but that is extremely weird. Guess Xbench isnt reliable on the G5s yet.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom
Back