Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

raw911

macrumors regular
Original poster
Mar 24, 2003
221
0
just ran a quick geekbench ... will finish other test tomorrow .. gotta get some sleep ...

Platform: Mac OS X x86 (32-bit)
Compiler: GCC 4.0.1 (Apple Inc. build 5484)
Operating System: Mac OS X 10.5.6 (Build 9G3553)
Model: MacPro4,1
Motherboard: Apple Inc. Mac-F221BEC8
Processor: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5550 @ 2.67GHz
Processor ID: GenuineIntel Family 6 Model 26 Stepping 5
Logical Processors: 16
Physical Processors: 1
Processor Frequency: 2.66 GHz
L1 Instruction Cache: 32.0 KB
L1 Data Cache: 32.0 KB
L2 Cache: 256 KB
L3 Cache: 8.00 MB
Bus Frequency: 6.40 GHz
Memory: 6.00 GB
Memory Type: 1066 MHz DDR3
SIMD: 1
BIOS: Apple Inc. MP41.88Z.0081.B03.0902231259
Processor Model: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5550 @ 2.67GHz
Processor Cores: 16

Integer (Score: 12870)
Blowfish single-threaded scalar -- 1853, , 81.4 MB/sec
Blowfish multi-threaded scalar -- 23997, , 983.4 MB/sec
Text Compress single-threaded scalar -- 2376, , 7.60 MB/sec
Text Compress multi-threaded scalar -- 22698, , 74.5 MB/sec
Text Decompress single-threaded scalar -- 2463, , 10.1 MB/sec
Text Decompress multi-threaded scalar -- 24646, , 98.2 MB/sec
Image Compress single-threaded scalar -- 2118, , 17.5 Mpixels/sec
Image Compress multi-threaded scalar -- 21188, , 178.3 Mpixels/sec
Image Decompress single-threaded scalar -- 1769, , 29.7 Mpixels/sec
Image Decompress multi-threaded scalar -- 14003, , 228.5 Mpixels/sec
Lua single-threaded scalar -- 3892, , 1.50 Mnodes/sec
Lua multi-threaded scalar -- 33446, , 12.9 Mnodes/sec

Floating Point (Score: 25083)
Mandelbrot single-threaded scalar -- 2556, , 1.70 Gflops
Mandelbrot multi-threaded scalar -- 36179, , 23.7 Gflops
Dot Product single-threaded scalar -- 4159, , 2.01 Gflops
Dot Product multi-threaded scalar -- 33873, , 15.4 Gflops
Dot Product single-threaded vector -- 4943, , 5.92 Gflops
Dot Product multi-threaded vector -- 43542, , 45.3 Gflops
LU Decomposition single-threaded scalar -- 881, , 784.0 Mflops
LU Decomposition multi-threaded scalar -- 7233, , 6.34 Gflops
Primality Test single-threaded scalar -- 4413, , 659.1 Mflops
Primality Test multi-threaded scalar -- 34109, , 6.33 Gflops
Sharpen Image single-threaded scalar -- 6136, , 14.3 Mpixels/sec
Sharpen Image multi-threaded scalar -- 68429, , 157.7 Mpixels/sec
Blur Image single-threaded scalar -- 7932, , 6.28 Mpixels/sec
Blur Image multi-threaded scalar -- 96788, , 76.1 Mpixels/sec

Memory (Score: 4330)
Read Sequential single-threaded scalar -- 4400, , 5.39 GB/sec
Write Sequential single-threaded scalar -- 6941, , 4.75 GB/sec
Stdlib Allocate single-threaded scalar -- 3495, , 13.0 Mallocs/sec
Stdlib Write single-threaded scalar -- 3138, , 6.49 GB/sec
Stdlib Copy single-threaded scalar -- 3677, , 3.79 GB/sec

Stream (Score: 4101)
Stream Copy single-threaded scalar -- 4288, , 5.87 GB/sec
Stream Copy single-threaded vector -- 5079, , 6.59 GB/sec
Stream Scale single-threaded scalar -- 4733, , 6.14 GB/sec
Stream Scale single-threaded vector -- 5095, , 6.88 GB/sec
Stream Add single-threaded scalar -- 2371, , 3.58 GB/sec
Stream Add single-threaded vector -- 4901, , 6.82 GB/sec
Stream Triad single-threaded scalar -- 2579, , 3.56 GB/sec
Stream Triad single-threaded vector -- 3765, , 7.05 GB/sec
 
Section Description Score Geekbench Score = 14559

Geekbench 2.1.2 for Mac OS X x86 (32-bit)
Integer Processor integer performance 12870

Floating Point Processor floating point performance 25083

Memory Memory performance 4330

Stream Memory bandwidth performance 4101
 
Thanks!! This is exactly what I was looking for!!

Whoa its not that much slower than the 2.93ghz!! I think I'm going to get the 2.66ghz octad!!
 
Thanks!! This is exactly what I was looking for!!

Whoa its not that much slower than the 2.93ghz!! I think I'm going to get the 2.66ghz octad!!

i got to admit ... it is nice .... now i really got to get my butt to sleep ..:eek:
 
i got to admit ... it is nice .... now i really got to get my butt to sleep ..:eek:

How does it feel using OSX? Does it feel very responsive especially just doing daily tasks with heavy multitasking??

That new architecture sure has to have SOME extra help to the snappiness.
 
2.26 octo geekbench

Here it is! I am very pleased with the performance so far. In just a few hours of using this, I was able to install OS X, CS4, Office, copy all of my music, photos, email, etc. This machine rocks!

This geekbench run score was 13,588. Prior run was 13,878. Very consistent so far.

Platform: Mac OS X x86 (64-bit)
Compiler: GCC 4.0.1 (Apple Inc. build 5484)
Operating System: Mac OS X 10.5.6 (Build 9G3553)
Model: MacPro4,1
Motherboard: Apple Inc. Mac-F221BEC8
Processor: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5520 @ 2.27GHz
Processor ID: GenuineIntel Family 6 Model 26 Stepping 5
Logical Processors: 16
Physical Processors: 1
Processor Frequency: 2.26 GHz
L1 Instruction Cache: 32.0 KB
L1 Data Cache: 32.0 KB
L2 Cache: 256 KB
L3 Cache: 8.00 MB
Bus Frequency: 5.87 GHz
Memory: 6.00 GB
Memory Type: 1066 MHz DDR3
SIMD: 1
BIOS: Apple Inc. MP41.88Z.0081.B03.0902231259
Processor Model: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5520 @ 2.27GHz
Processor Cores: 16

Integer (Score: 12694)
Blowfish single-threaded scalar -- 1599, , 70.3 MB/sec
Blowfish multi-threaded scalar -- 20473, , 839.0 MB/sec
Text Compress single-threaded scalar -- 2260, , 7.23 MB/sec
Text Compress multi-threaded scalar -- 21863, , 71.7 MB/sec
Text Decompress single-threaded scalar -- 2331, , 9.58 MB/sec
Text Decompress multi-threaded scalar -- 23744, , 94.6 MB/sec
Image Compress single-threaded scalar -- 2129, , 17.6 Mpixels/sec
Image Compress multi-threaded scalar -- 22047, , 185.5 Mpixels/sec
Image Decompress single-threaded scalar -- 2098, , 35.2 Mpixels/sec
Image Decompress multi-threaded scalar -- 16001, , 261.1 Mpixels/sec
Lua single-threaded scalar -- 3996, , 1.54 Mnodes/sec
Lua multi-threaded scalar -- 33788, , 13.0 Mnodes/sec

Floating Point (Score: 22512)
Mandelbrot single-threaded scalar -- 2118, , 1.41 Gflops
Mandelbrot multi-threaded scalar -- 29911, , 19.6 Gflops
Dot Product single-threaded scalar -- 3458, , 1.67 Gflops
Dot Product multi-threaded scalar -- 27759, , 12.7 Gflops
Dot Product single-threaded vector -- 4143, , 4.96 Gflops
Dot Product multi-threaded vector -- 46827, , 48.7 Gflops
LU Decomposition single-threaded scalar -- 1502, , 1.34 Gflops
LU Decomposition multi-threaded scalar -- 11874, , 10.4 Gflops
Primality Test single-threaded scalar -- 5247, , 783.7 Mflops
Primality Test multi-threaded scalar -- 39489, , 7.33 Gflops
Sharpen Image single-threaded scalar -- 5206, , 12.1 Mpixels/sec
Sharpen Image multi-threaded scalar -- 55044, , 126.8 Mpixels/sec
Blur Image single-threaded scalar -- 6628, , 5.24 Mpixels/sec
Blur Image multi-threaded scalar -- 75974, , 59.7 Mpixels/sec

Memory (Score: 4208)
Read Sequential single-threaded scalar -- 3997, , 4.89 GB/sec
Write Sequential single-threaded scalar -- 6590, , 4.51 GB/sec
Stdlib Allocate single-threaded scalar -- 3887, , 14.5 Mallocs/sec
Stdlib Write single-threaded scalar -- 3049, , 6.31 GB/sec
Stdlib Copy single-threaded scalar -- 3521, , 3.63 GB/sec

Stream (Score: 4249)
Stream Copy single-threaded scalar -- 3643, , 4.98 GB/sec
Stream Copy single-threaded vector -- 5084, , 6.59 GB/sec
Stream Scale single-threaded scalar -- 3693, , 4.79 GB/sec
Stream Scale single-threaded vector -- 4772, , 6.44 GB/sec
Stream Add single-threaded scalar -- 4190, , 6.32 GB/sec
Stream Add single-threaded vector -- 4973, , 6.92 GB/sec
Stream Triad single-threaded scalar -- 3970, , 5.49 GB/sec
Stream Triad single-threaded vector -- 3674, , 6.88 GB/sec
 
Thanks!! This is exactly what I was looking for!!

Whoa its not that much slower than the 2.93ghz!! I think I'm going to get the 2.66ghz octad!!

FYI
The 2.93GHz score 32-bit Geebench score is 15756.
The 2.93GHz is 10.1% higher in frequency than the 2.66GHz.
The Geekbench 32-bit score is 7.5% higher.
 
FYI
The 2.93GHz score 32-bit Geebench score is 15756.
The 2.93GHz is 10.1% higher in frequency than the 2.66GHz.
The Geekbench 32-bit score is 7.5% higher.

So basically the 2.93GHz is only 7.5% faster than the 2.66GHz but for 30% more in price compared to the 2.93GHz.

2.66GHz model is the way to go for me! :D
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.