Generate random scientific papers

[Flowbee]

I'm sure this has made the rounds on the interweb, but I couldn't find a link to it here.

http://pdos.csail.mit.edu/scigen

At first glance, the papers are surprisingly authentic looking, including charts, graphs, and footnotes. Here's a preview of my current research...

Client-Server, Collaborative Modalities

Flowbee and Herman Munster


Abstract

Many hackers worldwide would agree that, had it not been for Smalltalk, the study of courseware might never have occurred. Here, we argue the analysis of the UNIVAC computer. In this position paper, we show that even though the UNIVAC computer and Smalltalk can cooperate to answer this question, the producer-consumer problem can be made Bayesian, optimal, and robust...

Have fun. Post your results here.

 

[Whyren]

Fun . A nice break from having to read things like this...

Architecting IPv4 Using Bayesian Archetypes

Akiko Okizaki, Katherine Rämstadt, Seville Mariner and John Debusse

Abstract

Evolutionary programming must work. After years of significant research into SMPs, we demonstrate the improvement of replication. In our research, we prove not only that randomized algorithms can be made collaborative, wireless, and "smart", but that the same is true for flip-flop gates.

 

[jestershinra]

LOL- excellent!

 

[homerjward]

A Case for Interrupts
Enrico Fermi, Charles Darwin, Ernest Rutherford, Kevin Mitnick and Stephen Hawking
Abstract
E-business and expert systems, while key in theory, have not until recently been considered typical. in fact, few hackers worldwide would disagree with the development of the UNIVAC computer, which embodies the private principles of operating systems. Our focus in this paper is not on whether massive multiplayer online role-playing games and congestion control are never incompatible, but rather on describing a novel methodology for the refinement of multi-processors (OXHEAD).

oh, and i just had to post this image from the paper:

 

[Demon Hunter]

Wow, that is amazing.

If you could randomly generate from a category of science or field of study, damn, that might generate a few D+ papers.

 

[Lacero]

Towards the Synthesis of Forward-Error Correction

Abstract

The refinement of link-level acknowledgements is an unproven challenge. Given the current status of peer-to-peer modalities, system administrators dubiously desire the synthesis of web browsers, which embodies the theoretical principles of programming languages. In order to achieve this intent, we use optimal symmetries to show that the acclaimed interposable algorithm for the synthesis of model checking [21] follows a Zipf-like distribution.

 

[Kernow]

I love the fact that the authors of this actually managed to get one of their randomly generated papers accepted at a conference and held a seminar around a completely randomly generated topic.

Link

 

[chucknorris]

I love this kind of stuff. Hilarious!

Many hackers worldwide would agree that, had it not been for RAID, the deployment of agents might never have occurred. In this position paper, we verify the synthesis of Markov models. Similarly, The notion that information theorists interfere with agents is largely adamantly opposed. The analysis of information retrieval systems would tremendously amplify Byzantine fault tolerance.

 

[Deepdale]

I love this kind of stuff. Hilarious!

All I could hope for is that the research paper would be limited to no more than 1,000 words.

 

[MongoTheGeek]

All I could hope for is that the research paper would be limited to no more than 1,000 words.

Thats what the summarize feature is for in OSX.

 

[Abstract]

I keep pressing the "generate" button with the hopes that one related to radiotherapy shows up, and yet I get nothing.

 

[Lyle]

I keep pressing the "generate" button with the hopes that one related to radiotherapy shows up, and yet I get nothing.

Yeah, the information at the top of the page indicates that the current software only generates random Computer Science papers. I'm guessing that if you were able to seed it with a sufficient number of radiotherapy-related papers, it could generate a random paper on that topic as well.

 

[Lyle]

I love the fact that the authors of this actually managed to get one of their randomly generated papers accepted at a conference and held a seminar around a completely randomly generated topic.

For the morbidly curious, here is the conference site and here is their mea culpa about having accepted the bogus paper(s).

 

[wordmunger]

Well, I could tell it was bogus pretty quickly. But it's a fun little site.

Towards the Visualization of Agents

Fozzie Bear and Dave Munger


Abstract

In recent years, much research has been devoted to the evaluation of superpages; nevertheless, few have visualized the analysis of sensor networks [1]. In fact, few theorists would disagree with the analysis of the World Wide Web [2]. In order to realize this goal, we concentrate our efforts on arguing that XML and I/O automata [1] can cooperate to accomplish this intent.

Table of Contents

1) Introduction
2) MokyWark Study
3) Implementation
4) Results and Analysis
4.1) Hardware and Software Configuration
4.2) Experiments and Results
5) Related Work
6) Conclusion

 

[leftbanke7]

Did anybody notice that it will insert your made up authors into the references page (or at least it did in mine)?

 

[Flowbee]

Did anybody notice that it will insert your made up authors into the references page (or at least it did in mine)?

Good catch, I hadn't noticed. Another fun feature is the "Download a pdf" link at the top of your random paper. It gives you a 2 column layout ready for publication. Very professional.