Sidebar Sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Gizmodo Has sinned.....

yode said:
they have a point with some of the threads that have been coming up on here..
Click to expand...

They are talking about on the front page of Macrumors (what macrumors is posting) if that is what you mean....... what post are you talking about
 
gizmodo is so full of crap anyway, it's pathetic. they really are a bunch of immature kiddies that try to get attention any way possible. it's best to just ignore them
 
johnwin said:
I still remember the 'iPhone' episode from last year. Gizmodo will never have any credibility whilst Brian Lam is incumbent (recumbent?). The CES 'look at my fancy IR remote' did not help either!
Click to expand...

Also Last time I checked Gizmodo was not involved in the rumors.. they seem more involved in what Engadget is posting then rewording it and posting it on their site
 
johnwin said:
I still remember the 'iPhone' episode from last year. Gizmodo will never have any credibility whilst Brian Lam is incumbent (recumbent?). The CES 'look at my fancy IR remote' did not help either!
Click to expand...

So they have done something like this before?
 
Gizmodo is OK, MacRumors is OK, Appleinsider is OK, my mother-in law is OK: they are all sources of entertaining news, no more and no less. So the Giz guys should put a rocket up their derrière, light it and shut up while they enjoy the fireworks.
 
Gizmodo is run by a bunch of childish bastards. Can't remember the last time they actually posted something constructful.
 
animenick65 said:
Gizmodo is run by a bunch of childish bastards. Can't remember the last time they actually posted something constructful.
Click to expand...

That is actually not true. The 'Bastard' part I have no idea as I have no inside information regarding their family history. But they do post some interesting stuff and they can be funny.
 
fastbite said:
That is actually not true. The 'Bastard' part I have no idea as I have no inside information regarding their family history. But they do post some interesting stuff and they can be funny.
Click to expand...

The stuff they post is not original they get everything from Engadget
 
greenmymac said:
The stuff they post is not original they get everything from Engadget
Click to expand...

That i do take offense to (if you can actually take offense about **** like that - I mean seriously...)
Engadget are really boring. I mean really really really boring. And I guess that's the biggest insult to a tech blog. So there you go. Boring.
 
fastbite said:
That i do take offense to (if you can actually take offense about **** like that - I mean seriously...)
Engadget are really boring. I mean really really really boring. And I guess that's the biggest insult to a tech blog. So there you go. Boring.
Click to expand...

I find Gizmodo more boring the only thing I enjoy from Engadget is the Engadget HD blog
 
Shackler said:
I don't know why everyone on here is mad. they called Macrumors a Veteran site at Apple rumors?
Click to expand...

BUt right after that they said

are non-sourced, usually building up from the updrafts of the blog/analyst/network news circle jerk vortex.
 
greenmymac said:
BUt right after that they said

are non-sourced, usually building up from the updrafts of the blog/analyst/network news circle jerk vortex.
Click to expand...

They said that those types of rumors are the ones ignored by MacRumors and AppleInsider. It's a compliment.
 
I don't get it... They complimented MacRumors

Gizmodo said:
The majority of Apple rumors ignored by the veterans at sites like Macrumors and Apple Insider are non-sourced, usually building up from the updrafts of the blog/analyst/network news circle jerk vortex.
Click to expand...

Also, I like Gizmodo... They are pretty funny.
 
The majority of Apple rumors ignored by the veterans at sites like Macrumors and Apple Insider are non-sourced, usually building up from the updrafts of the blog/analyst/network news circle jerk vortex.


i.e. Of the rumors rejected by veterans at MR and AI, these rejected rumors are usually non-sourced, usually building up from the updrafts of the blog/analyst/network news circle jerk vortex.

Giz isn't dissing MR or AI, it's just saying they reject some rumors, and of those rumours, most of them haven't got a source.

The site linked to is pretencious - talking about "we", where there is no feedback, no open information to show user input, just a way to send a message to the creator.

They got it wrong - it's the linked site that is a desperate plea.
 
Sorry, the stuff Gizmodo posts is just plain copied and stupid. The front page things Macrumors posts is full of insight and well written.
 
I stopped reading Engadget due to the amount of faggotry in their posts.

And I read Gizmodo with a giant spoon of salt since Blam started to mix political articles with tech news, especially when he didnt even understand the political situation he complains about.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom
Back