Glossy is of course going to have glare, especially the piece of plexiglass over the glossy screen. I did not have a choice on my 13", and I deal with glare by increasing the brightness of the screen. This does reduce battery life though too.
There is no plexiglass over the glossy screen...
Underneath the REAL hardened glass screen is the same display as the AG uses. Its just that the covering is different and applied differently. The glass screen is adhered to the black border it rests on while the AG screen tucks under a silver bezel that people either love or hate.
I think that it is a definite plus that the glossy has a real glass screen cover - as it is infinitely easier to clean than the rough and much thinner AG screen cover.
glare? yes. it happens, but doesn't bother me a whole lot, I just try to use it in places that won't give me too much glare. I'm certain AG would alleviate this, but I like the look of the glossy better.
topic says it all....im debating between matte and glossy....i know the glossy looks nicer but if it causes major glare and causes brutal eye strain as opposed to the matte....i dunno....anyone?
It is simply IMO. If you are one of those Apple users that buy MBPs first for their looks you might go for the shiny glass. If you want your notebook to be first a tool for work and other stuff that does what it is supposed to in any condition you will be happy with AG. AG just works everywhere perfectly without having to worry about anything. Glossy offers in direct comparison maybe slightly better contrast but if you use it on reasonable brightness levels indoors or at any brightness outdoors there will be reflections.
It is nice not having to worry at all but reflections don't make the notebook unusable (expect outdoors sometimes). In general it is just annoying.
If you are like me and don't really know what the point of a keyboard backlight really is you might prefer AG. If a keyboard back light is an awesome feature in your eyes you are probably one who should go for glossy.
My issue with a keyboard back light is twofold. 1. everybody who uses his notebook seriously and for work will not need to look at the keys anyway. 2. There are few occasions where you would use a notebook in total darkness anyway as this is both bad for your eyes and unnecessary (unless you have to avoid annoying reflections) 3. even if you use it in total darkness the display usually lights up the keys enough.
Ergo keyboard back-light is only for amateurs and people that just think it looks cool.
If you care about color accuracy, glossy. If you care about having a little bit less glare than glossy in 100% direct sunlight, antiglare. I've used my glossy 15" MBP in class with a glass wall behind me that lets in 100% sunlight, no problems. I don't see why anyone would go for antiglare. Using a notebook, you can always move around to not be in 100% direct sunlight.
I dont see why I should have be constrained where I use my laptop and hence went for the AG screen. I seriously have never regretted it. Its spanky!
Apple said:Look at the MacBook Pro display and you’ll see another big difference. Glass. That edge-to-edge, uninterrupted glass display does more than look good. It also adds structure to the LED display beneath it.
If you care about color accuracy, glossy. If you care about having a little bit less glare than glossy in 100% direct sunlight, antiglare. I've used my glossy 15" MBP in class with a glass wall behind me that lets in 100% sunlight, no problems. I don't see why anyone would go for antiglare. Using a notebook, you can always move around to not be in 100% direct sunlight.
This is definitely not true. I do not know where you got this from, but first this is not glass. It is a plexiglas like material. Then the displays are not the same. The Anti glare display is a matte LCD screen, while the glossy is a glossy LCD panel covered by the plexiglas like material. The LCD panels are easily distinguished as different for they use different model number panels. Then if apple just put plexiglas over a matte LCD panel, it would be terrible, muted colors and glare from the plexiglas.
Also I believe the glossy LCD's bezel is part of the plexiglas and not aluminum like on the matte display.
By the way, glare is especially bad under flourescent lights like at college. I have much fewer issues with glare at home.
I still love my MacBook pro, but the glare caused by the "glass" on top of the already glossy LCD panel is ridiculous.
Your definitely incorrect about quite a few things again. The matte display is the bare LCD panel. Then the glossy does have a bezel; I have seen videos of the glass being removed. And the black border around the display is either plastic glued to the glass or a dyed/painted area of the glass, because the LCD panel is rectangular and does not extend to the edges of the lid. I am a little surprised you think this as well. And I think the older iPhones and iPod touches use a type of plexiglas as well. I have not seen an iPad and the iPhone 4 is made with gorilla glass.I will wait for the chemical analysis on screen cover composition - but there have been many threads here on experience with the glossy screens and one persistent observation is that they don't scratch. Plexiglass easily scratches. Your iPhone screen is glass. The iPad screen is glass. I assume that Apple knows what it is doing with glass and the MBP screen cover is another manifestation of that.
I will agree that I don't know a lot about the parts numbers of the LCD screens beneath the screen covers - but I doubt the AG screen is a naked matte LCD screen. It would more than make sense that the LCD screens beneath are identical but the differences are in the screen cover - either glass or a plexiglass matte layer that mutes the image.
The glossy screen has no bezel - the aluminum around the edge is the case cover that wraps around, within which the glass and LCD monitor rests. The "black" border is the glass screen cover resting on a black non-active area of the LCD screen.
And I still don't get the complaints about glare. I am starting to guess that most complainers have never used the machine in all these environments. I have used my machine so far under halogens, fluourescents, incandescents, even LED lighting, near every window imaginable - and occasionally outside. I have no complaints...
JB