I would never base my decision to purchase a high end computer based of someone else's review. Sure he makes some valid points based off his opinion but for every person that doesn't like something there are a thousand people who do(and visa-versa).
I would never base my decision to purchase a high end computer based of someone else's review. Sure he makes some valid points based off his opinion but for every person that doesn't like something there are a thousand people who do(and visa-versa).
The fact of the matter is that Apple needs to (and probably will soon) offer the same $50 matte/anti-glare treatment on the 15.4-inch MacBook Pro as they do on the 17-inch MacBook Pro.
The thing that I am not too sure of is they will ever make that offer with the 13-inch MacBook.
I would never base my decision to purchase a high end computer based of someone else's review. Sure he makes some valid points based off his opinion but for every person that doesn't like something there are a thousand people who do(and visa-versa).
BS 1: "Photoshop CS4 users will appreciate the beefier graphics subsystem"
Photoshop mainly uses the CPU not the graphics cards
The guy who wrote that article is pretty much a fool and most of it is total bs.
Some examples:
BS 1: "Photoshop CS4 users will appreciate the beefier graphics subsystem"
Photoshop mainly uses the CPU not the graphics cards
BS 2: "The only significant colour error is in reds and oranges, which are considerably skewed in both hue and saturation and really don't look right on this display"
Probably because he didnt bother to calibrate his screen or modify the alpha settings as everyone should do when buying a Macbook/Macbook Pro
BS 3: How the hell can you even compare a Dell with an Atom processor with an Apple Macbook Pro with a Core 2 Duo?!?!?
CS4 does use the graphics card...
The guy who wrote that article is pretty much a fool and most of it is total bs.
Some examples:
BS 1: "Photoshop CS4 users will appreciate the beefier graphics subsystem"
Photoshop mainly uses the CPU not the graphics cards
BS 2: "The only significant colour error is in reds and oranges, which are considerably skewed in both hue and saturation and really don't look right on this display"
Probably because he didnt bother to calibrate his screen or modify the alpha settings as everyone should do when buying a Macbook/Macbook Pro
BS 3: How the hell can you even compare a Dell with an Atom processor with an Apple Macbook Pro with a Core 2 Duo?!?!?
+1 yeah baby!I just saw the resale value of my matted 2.5 GhZ go up...
The guy who wrote that article is pretty much a fool and most of it is total bs.
Some examples:
BS 1: "Photoshop CS4 users will appreciate the beefier graphics subsystem"
Photoshop mainly uses the CPU not the graphics cards
BS 2: "The only significant colour error is in reds and oranges, which are considerably skewed in both hue and saturation and really don't look right on this display"
Probably because he didnt bother to calibrate his screen or modify the alpha settings as everyone should do when buying a Macbook/Macbook Pro
BS 3: How the hell can you even compare a Dell with an Atom processor with an Apple Macbook Pro with a Core 2 Duo?!?!?
+1
Also Rob Galbraith= blah blah blah
Don't take his words too seriously. There was this whole Canon Mark III thing, and he did get Canon to fix issues and it is fixed and done with, but he still slaps it down. I wouldn't trust his knowledge with high end computers, cameras on the other hand .... maybe.![]()
The guy who wrote that article is pretty much a fool and most of it is total bs.
BS 3: How the hell can you even compare a Dell with an Atom processor with an Apple Macbook Pro with a Core 2 Duo?!?!?
The fact that the Dell's screen stands up very well to the MacBook Pro should be an embarrassment to Apple
Thats the thing though, it doesnt, an Atom Processor just isnt comparable to a Core 2 Duo, its like comparing a Ferrari to a Horse and Cart, i think its rather misleading to people who dont know much about computer systems to use it as his comparison.
Thats the thing though, it doesnt, an Atom Processor just isnt comparable to a Core 2 Duo, its like comparing a Ferrari to a Horse and Cart, i think its rather misleading to people who dont know much about computer systems to use it as his comparison.