Article from New York Times about how many world class runners find the fuss with quant data unnecessary.
I’m not as extreme but I do find most of the data to be quite useless and fussy. It may even take away from the important skill of knowing your body sensually.
I’m no longer a competitive runner, but when I was, all I needed was really a timer and knowing the distance which GPS helped. Running intervals regularly on the track helped hone in pacing and correlating with feel and effort.
At this point in my running, it’s time and distance that’s still most useful and heart rate a second point. All other data my Watch collects is fun to look at now and then but I make zero use of it. I don’t fuss with it.
From the article:
Gift link, no paywall:
www.nytimes.com
I’m not as extreme but I do find most of the data to be quite useless and fussy. It may even take away from the important skill of knowing your body sensually.
I’m no longer a competitive runner, but when I was, all I needed was really a timer and knowing the distance which GPS helped. Running intervals regularly on the track helped hone in pacing and correlating with feel and effort.
At this point in my running, it’s time and distance that’s still most useful and heart rate a second point. All other data my Watch collects is fun to look at now and then but I make zero use of it. I don’t fuss with it.
From the article:
For many, GPS watches are a remarkably useful training tool. But there are other runners, including world-class runners like Jacobs, who have a hard time understanding the fuss. To them, a smorgasbord of data is more hindrance than help. And get this: Some runners don’t wear watches at all.
“I like to focus more on the feel of everything and not worry too much about the time,” Jacobs said.
Gift link, no paywall:

GPS Watch? No Thanks. Top Runners Are Ditching the Data. (Gift Article)
An increasing number of elite distance runners don’t wear activity tracking or GPS watches. They think they are better athletes because of it.