Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
67,701
38,168


The iPhone 12 Pro Max is Apple's most expensive and most advanced iPhone this year, offering camera technology that's not present in any of the other iPhones in the 2020 lineup. The iPhone 12 Pro Max features a larger sensor for the wide-angle camera, DSLR-like stabilization, and a longer telephoto lens.

rearcameradarkiphone12pro.jpg

Sebastiaan de With, the developer behind camera app Halide who often do detailed looks at new camera features in iPhones, has shared an in-depth account of the updated hardware in the iPhone 12 Pro Max and what that means for camera quality.

The blog post shared by de With has a great visualization of the larger sensor in the iPhone 12 Pro Max, which is 47 percent larger than the sensor in the prior-generation iPhone. The sensor lets in more light, resulting in less noise and sharper results.

As with other camera tests, straight out of the camera comparison shots during the daytime featuring the iPhone 12 and the iPhone 12 Pro Max do not show a major difference, and according to Halide's developers, this is because the larger sensor primarily shines in lower lighting conditions.

In lower lighting, such as during sunset, the iPhone 12 Pro Max is able to pull out more detail, but Apple's own camera algorithms have enough noise reduction that the difference is tough to see. A comparison of RAW photos, however, shows a more stark difference between the iPhone 12 Pro Max and the iPhone 12 because Apple's noise reduction isn't a factor.

de With believes that the iPhone 12 Pro Max could stand to have less processing to "show off its higher signal to noise ratio," and when shooting in RAW, the iPhone 12 Pro Max demonstrates a "big leap ahead in image quality."

Sensor-shift stabilization, which applies stabilization directly to the sensor, also helps the iPhone 12 Pro Max put out significantly better images in lower lighting because it works more quickly. The iPhone 12 Pro Max can manage longer shutter times in a handheld mode than are possible with a DSLR, which de With describes as "very cool stuff."

halide-camera-comparison.jpg
Photo by Halide developer Sebastiaan de With. Night Mode on iPhone 12 Pro Max, an unsteady iPhone 12 Pro RAW, and an unsteady iPhone 12 Pro Max RAW.
With a traditional DSLR, nobody would dare take a one-second photos handheld. Yet the iPhone 12 Pro Max can take sharp images at ridiculous exposure times.

In this last comparison, you can see that Night Mode can get this shot, but it sacrifices lots of fine detail and makes the scene look a bit unnatural. The iPhone 12 Pro, with its more basic stabilization, can't get a steady frame. It would be impossible to get a shot like this on the iPhone 12, 11 Pro, or heck, the high-end digital cameras I have lying around the studio.
All in all, de With says that the iPhone 12 Pro Max marks a huge leap forward in camera quality, especially for advanced users.
As developers of a camera app, the results mind-blowing. It achieves images previously only seen in dedicated cameras, with sensors four times its size. It allows photographers to get steady and well exposed shots in conditions that weren't imaginable a year ago. It captures low-light shots beyond anything we've seen on an iPhone. By a lot.
The full in-depth article from de With is well worth checking out. It includes a closer look at the telephoto lens, notes on ProRAW, and comparison images that clearly show the differences between the 12 Pro Max and other iPhone 12 models.

Article Link: Halide Developer Does Deep Dive Into iPhone 12 Pro Max Photographic Capabilities
 
  • Like
Reactions: Giano
Yea - I upgraded to the 12 Max but I must be old/blind, etc. About the only difference/improvement I've seen its with night video and photography and that's about it - anyone on the plain 12 should not feel they are missing a lot here
 
I can't believe I'm saying this but so far most of the images I've seen are inferior to pics taken on the 11 Pro, simply because it seems like the 12 Pro/Max cranks up the HDR effect wayyyy too much resulting in really 'flat' looking images with no depth to them. It's probably just a software thing but does anyone else notice this?

Night Mode looks better though. The real test for me will be seeing what people can do with RAW images taken on the 12PM, is there more room to play with light and color in post? So far the only RAW images I've seen have come from the Halide blog and they look extremely promising.

SmartRAW looks like a fad so I'm not interested in that, I saw some examples on Twitter showing how much detail is lost in SmartRAW compared to straight up RAW taken with something like Halide.
 
Last edited:
It is an exciting time if you enjoy taking pictures! I thought the stabilization on the 11 Pro Max was great for video. The new System seems even more impressive with the limited opportunities I have had so far. Since I got the 11 Pro Max last year I have found myself taking more video than I ever did before. I think that trend may continue with the 12 Pro Max.
 
Most people aren’t good enough at photography to understand or realize benefits.

Most people also think brighter means it’s better.

Yep, and in this case the brighter image looks worse to me in many cases. Let's hope Apple adjusts the formula a little.
 
  • Like
Reactions: atmuris
I can't believe I'm saying this but so far most of the images I've seen are inferior to pics taken on the 11 Pro, simply because it seems like the 12 Pro/Max cranks up the HDR effect wayyyy too much resulting in really 'flat' looking images with no depth to them. It's probably just a software thing but does anyone else notice this?

Night Mode looks better though. The real test for me will be seeing what people can do with RAW images taken on the 12PM, is there more room to play with light and color in post? So far the only RAW images I've seen have come from the Halide blog and they look extremely promising.

SmartRAW looks like a fad so I'm not interested in that, I saw some examples on Twitter showing how much detail is lost in SmartRAW compared to straight up RAW taken with something like Halide.
It's likely because you are looking at HDR pictures on a non-HDR capable screen. That will end up displaying washed-out colors.
@zakarhino Your point on RAW v. SmartRAW is interesting, do you mind sharing the link?
 
Last edited:
I can't believe I'm saying this but so far most of the images I've seen are inferior to pics taken on the 11 Pro, simply because it seems like the 12 Pro/Max cranks up the HDR effect wayyyy too much resulting in really 'flat' looking images with no depth to them. It's probably just a software thing but does anyone else notice this?

Night Mode looks better though. The real test for me will be seeing what people can do with RAW images taken on the 12PM, is there more room to play with light and color in post? So far the only RAW images I've seen have come from the Halide blog and they look extremely promising.

SmartRAW looks like a fad so I'm not interested in that, I saw some examples on Twitter showing how much detail is lost in SmartRAW compared to straight up RAW taken with something like Halide.
I think I know what you mean by that flat look. I first noted how iPhone camera photos can look when I noticed how my Pixel 2 and then my pixel 3XL were handling light differently. Apple has improved a lot especially with the iPhone 11 Pro camera and software processing for that camera. My SE2 was pretty good, too. But they have taken a small step backwards and are starting to flatten images again. Still, using my husband’s 12 Pro Max, I’ve gotten some cute late night pet photos that wouldn’t have turned out at all on any of my other cameras under the circumstances I was in.
 
"With a traditional DSLR, nobody would dare take a one-second photos handheld. Yet the iPhone 12 Pro Max can take sharp images at ridiculous exposure times."

Just that quote turned me off from the article. I can shoot a 1 second shot on a Nikon 5300 and a 24-70 Nikkor VR, and it'll shoot at a crisper, more defined picture than the iPhone 12 Pro Max. That being said, I'm not using my iPhone as my primary option for photography. It's much like any point-and-shoot, it's purely for convenience and not having my gear on me.

That being said, convenience to shoot a nice night shot just in a smartphone is dope! I love that capability that the Pro Max has PLUS the image stability. I can be shaky AF (relatively speaking) and still be able to shoot a balanced shot. That's really the biggest and selling benefit it has. Of course, I'm coming from an iPhone X, so I can't speak about what an iPhone 11 -> 12 means.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ramchi
I’m sure there are a few professional niche scenarios where the 12 Max outperforms the 12 pro, but I honestly can’t see much of a difference. I think if you prefer a larger size phone, then go Max, but I wouldn’t base the decision on the camera alone because for casual photography it’s just not substantially different than the 12 pro.
 
8297E804-7551-4E7E-96D2-DC82F638DBF2.jpeg

Halide guys does not understand the iPhone 12 pro max is 47% bigger by area. This is confirmed by the focal length of the lenses : 5,1mm for the max and 4,25mm for the iPhone 12. So, in fact, by diagonal, the max sensor is 1,2x bigger. This is how it looks :
6DD189F5-2865-4736-8EAA-74DE9E5C7A35.jpeg
 
Last edited:
There are a lot of reports from users mentioning focus issues, I wonder why these reviewers don't mention this?

 
the iPhone 12 pro max is 47% bigger by area. This is confirmed by the focal length of the lenses : 5,1mm for the max and 4,25mm for the iPhone 12. So, in fact, by diagonal, the max sensor is 1,2x bigger. This is how it looks :
Indeed, also confirmed by pixel pitch: 1,4µm and 1,7µm.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ohmyggg
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.