Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
68,574
39,430



Apple today released the watchOS 5.1.2 update to the public, and the update implements a much-anticipated ECG feature for all Apple Watch Series 4 users in the United States.

Following the launch of the new update, we installed the software and went hands-on with the ECG function to see just how it works.


An ECG, or electrocardiogram, is designed to measure the electrical activity of the heart to detect abnormal rhythms and diagnose serious heart conditions.

The Apple Watch Series 4 allows users to take a single-lead electrocardiogram to keep an eye on heart health. This isn't as informative or as sensitive as the multi-lead ECGs you might get in a doctor's office or hospital, which use several points of contact, but it provides valuable information for those who might not even be aware of a heart condition.

The ECG feature in the Apple Watch uses electrodes built into the sapphire crystal of the Apple Watch (where the heart rate sensor is located) and the Digital Crown that work together to detect the electrical impulses from your heartbeat and route the data to the S4 processor in the device, where it is converted into a signal for Apple's algorithms.

ecg1.jpg

You can take an ECG using the built-in ECG app on the Apple Watch, which walks you through the steps. You'll need to place a finger on the Digital Crown of the Apple Watch and wait for approximately 30 seconds while the measurement is taken.

ecg2.jpg

You'll see a countdown on your wrist, which is designed to let you know just how long your finger needs to stay in place before you can move it.

ecg-3.jpg

Following the conclusion of the ECG, Apple will provide a heart rhythm classification that can be shared with your doctor. If your heart is beating in a normal rhythm, Apple will let you know that a standard sinus rhythm has been detected. If your heart is not beating normally, however, the app will let you know that atrial fibrillation has been detected.

If atrial fibrillation is detected, Apple will suggest that you get in touch with your doctor for further testing.

All ECG results captured with the Apple Watch Series 4 are stored in the Health app in a format that's easy to export and share with your doctor.

ecg-4.jpg

Apple has received de novo FDA clearance for the ECG feature in the Apple Watch Series 4, but FDA clearance is not the same as full FDA approval. The FDA does not recommend that the ECG feature be used by those under 22 or those who have already been diagnosed with atrial fibrillation.

The Apple Watch Series 4's ECG function is not designed to replace traditional methods of diagnosis or treatment, and Apple intends for it to be used for informational purposes.

At the current time, Apple Watch Series 4 owners in the United States are the only Apple Watch customers who can take an ECG because the feature needs regulatory approval to be made available in other countries. Apple is working to expand the feature to additional countries.

While the ability to take an ECG is limited to Apple Watch Series 4 users, Apple is implementing a secondary feature designed to send Apple Watch Series 1, 2, 3, and 4 users a notification if an irregular heartbeat is detected via the normal heart rate sensor in the device.

What do you think of the ECG option in the Apple Watch? Let us know in the comments.

Article Link: Hands-On With the ECG Feature for Apple Watch Series 4
 
"Apple today released the watchOS 5.1.2 update to the public, and the update implements a much-anticipated ECG feature for all Apple Watch Series 4 users in the United States.
...
For now, the ECG feature is available in a beta capacity to developers who have the watchOS 5.1.2 update installed. There is no watchOS public beta, so non-developers will need to wait until the official release of watchOS 5.1.2 to install the update. "

wat?
 
I can tell you right now... this is going to create a lot of unnecessary anxiety for countless users who see an occasional heart jump on the display. Admittedly, it might help a few people too.
This is gong to be one of those devices that people either obsess on, (100x worse than your iPhone battery capacity meter) or learn to ignore and not use after a few panicked visits to the Dr, reveal nothing can be done about occasional irregular heartbeats.

It's going to be helpful and harmful. The few it helps will come at the expense of the many who develop anxiety disorders staring at it incessantly.
 
How is this "information only" any different to other smart watch functions like heart rate, sleep patterns or fall detection?

We all know these things aren't as accurate as lab controlled devices. Put a sticker disclaimer on advertising.

The possibility of informing someone of a potential problem must surely be way more important than not knowing.

How many Watch wearers have already proven early alerts have saved lives?
 
  • Like
Reactions: rjp1 and nekonokami
If that 98bpm is accurate, Dan might need to talk to his doctor about exercise.

Why? A normal resting heart rate is between 60-100 and he was even in that range while not resting. While a lower resting heart rate may indicate better cardiovascular shape, he also wasn't exactly resting while filming the video. Moving around, talking, maybe the stress of doing a video demo all would elevate his resting heart rate.
[doublepost=1544132426][/doublepost]
I predict a 200% rise in calls to the doctor by tomorrow.

So? If all those are false calls then perhaps a waste of time. But if some people get their lives saved by this was it really a waste of time? And don't tell me it depends on the people. ;)
 
How is this "information only" any different to other smart watch functions like heart rate, sleep patterns or fall detection?

We all know these things aren't as accurate as lab controlled devices. Put a sticker disclaimer on advertising.

The possibility of informing someone of a potential problem must surely be way more important than not knowing.

How many Watch wearers have already proven early alerts have saved lives?
Could be because Apple does not want to be sued out of existence.
 
I can tell you right now... this is going to create a lot of unnecessary anxiety for countless users who see an occasional heart jump on the display. Admittedly, it might help a few people too.
This is gong to be one of those devices that people either obsess on, (100x worse than your iPhone battery capacity meter) or learn to ignore and not use after a few panicked visits to the Dr, reveal nothing can be done about occasional irregular heartbeats.

It's going to be helpful and harmful. The few it helps will come at the expense of the many who develop anxiety disorders staring at it incessantly.

I would posit that anyone flying into a panic over this is already prone to panic. I don't think a calm, rational, intelligent human being is suddenly going to go bonkers over this. Hypochondriacs already call the doctor too much, this might just add an extra call here and there.
 
It seems a bit absurd that the FDA states this should not be used by those who already have been diagnosed with a-fib. Wouldn't such people want to know if their a-fib is being well controlled by whatever anti-a-fib-whatever their doctor has them on?
 
I just went out and bought an Apple watch for this very purpose. (plus I was about due, anyway.) I have occasional (2-3 times a year) heart palpitations and over the years the docs have never been able to capture it to see what was going on. Or to even know how often it happens (I only notice it when I'm in a sedentary posture.) It's difficult to describe the heartbeat pattern to a human, too.

At the very least this will likely let me know how often this occurs, I may not notice it sometimes. Plus if I'm able to capture it in-watch a few times perhaps the admittedly not entirely clinical tape could give a clue on where to look for problems with my ticker.

I'm not under any delusions that this qualifies as a medical device, but broadly it could give me an idea of how prevalent the problem really is, and perhaps the intensity of it at the time it occurs.
 
I can tell you right now... this is going to create a lot of unnecessary anxiety for countless users who see an occasional heart jump on the display. Admittedly, it might help a few people too.
This is gong to be one of those devices that people either obsess on, (100x worse than your iPhone battery capacity meter) or learn to ignore and not use after a few panicked visits to the Dr, reveal nothing can be done about occasional irregular heartbeats.

It's going to be helpful and harmful. The few it helps will come at the expense of the many who develop anxiety disorders staring at it incessantly.

I can tell you right now... Apple is deeply concerned that a product they make may suddenly cause unnecessary alarm to users and send them flocking to the doctor unnecessarily. The bad press would be epic. I am quite certain that they have carefully estimated the false positive rate vs. a true positive rate for alerts and are comfortable you will be proven quite wrong or they wouldn't have shipped this. Perhaps to make sure they reduce false positives it may in fact be very over-conservative and may miss people with irregular heart rhythms but while I'm sure there will be some hype over a literal handful of false positives from this product it will actually be used by MILLIONS and they will never get alerts until they need it.
 
This update works great! Much better than I expected.

Obviously carefully read the instructions when you set up the EKG app. It explains all of the features from the app.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nekonokami
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.