I don't even think the X25-M supports SMART..
Here is some info I found on SSD's and SMART:
SMART
While not new to 8820, our dealings with Intel have given us some further insight into reading the state of your X25 via smart data. The easiest, most freely available (for personal use) solution is with PassMark DiskCheckup.
Of the entries above, ID 5 is of interest. This entry relates to the number of flash blocks considered defective by the X25. A large spike in this value may indicate your X25 is nearing its end of useful life. My own drive still replies with 1 here, indicating it has 4 possible defective blocks (it's a 1:4 ratio for the 80GB X25-M). This is remarkable considering how hard Ive been on it. Important note: A value of 99 here indicates 0 defects. It seems backwards, but that's how SMART reporting works.
You can read about it here:
http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=691&type=expert&pid=9
What I don't understand is that he says, "A value of 99 here indicates 0 defects." My "Reallocated Sector Count" is 100, it is not 99 - which he says would be perfect with zero defects. I don't understand his reasoning for the 99 figure. Does anyone know?
Here is my SMART data:
DiskCheckup Version: DiskCheckup V2.1 Build: 1004
SmartDisk DLL Version: SmartDisk DLL SDK v1.0 Build: 1017
Time of export: 12:35:32 29-May-2009
Device ID: 0
Device Capacity: 76316 MB
Serial Number: CVEM846100Q2080DGN
Model Number: INTEL SSDSA2MH080G1GC
SMART ATTRIBUTES:
ID Description Raw Value Status Value Worst Threshold TEC
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 Spin Up Time 0ms OK 100 0 0 N.A.
4 Start/Stop Count 0 OK 100 0 0 N.A.
5 Reallocated Sector Count 0 OK 100 100 0 N.A.
9 Power On Time 435 OK 100 100 0 N.A.
C Power Cycle Count 123 OK 100 100 0 N.A.
C0 Power off Retract Count 97 OK 100 100 0 N.A.
E8 (Unknown attribute) 0 OK 100 100 10 N.A.
E9 (Unknown attribute) 0 OK 99 99 0 N.A.