I am trying to decide between the following machines (all will have 16gb ram and 512 ssd):
13” touchbar mbp with 3.5 i7 (dual core, not quad)
15” touchbar mbp with 2.8 i7
15” touchbar mbp with 3.1 i7
I am producing music that will involve synth and effects, not on the order of 40+ tracks right now, but who knows what the future holds. My common synths are max for cats Bengal and OSCiLLOT which can be cpu hungry.
If the 13” will work it would be preferrable because of size, but I am guessing the dual core would eventually be limiting? Among the 15” models, does it make sense to pay more for the 3.1 upgrade, or is the 2.8 plenty of power to last the next 4-5 years? Would the 2.8 be slower on single core tasks than the 3.5 dual core? Thanks!
13” touchbar mbp with 3.5 i7 (dual core, not quad)
15” touchbar mbp with 2.8 i7
15” touchbar mbp with 3.1 i7
I am producing music that will involve synth and effects, not on the order of 40+ tracks right now, but who knows what the future holds. My common synths are max for cats Bengal and OSCiLLOT which can be cpu hungry.
If the 13” will work it would be preferrable because of size, but I am guessing the dual core would eventually be limiting? Among the 15” models, does it make sense to pay more for the 3.1 upgrade, or is the 2.8 plenty of power to last the next 4-5 years? Would the 2.8 be slower on single core tasks than the 3.5 dual core? Thanks!