Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

macmike22

macrumors regular
Original poster
Oct 23, 2008
106
0
Hey
Can my Aluminum macbook play High definition DVDs? Will it play them to their highest definition? Forgive me for the possible stupid question, I just wanted to make sure before I blow my money on some HD DVDS.
 
Nothing plays HD DVDs anymore. HD DVD lost. There is no HD DVD player/burner in any Mac. It doesn't have an HD screen, anyway. It doesn't even support the protocol to play the disks if you attach an external player.
 
HD is 1920x1080 (1920x1200, 16:10) and up. I don't really see why people call 720p HD. Just because it's larger than what has been deemed standard definition? By that logic 1440x900 is HD and people certainly don't call it such.

720p, 1800i and 1080p are considered high definition video standards. Specifically, broadcast HD video standards.

More importantly, these are the standards content producers release their content in. So, in the end ... isn't that what matters?

(and yes, anything above standard definition is, by definition, high definition)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-definition_video - Read the external links, if you like.
 
It plays HD videos very nicely... Go to YouTube and watch a video in High Definition and you'll see a difference.. It looks great!
 
HD is 1920x1080 (1920x1200, 16:10) and up. I don't really see why people call 720p HD. Just because it's larger than what has been deemed standard definition? By that logic 1440x900 is HD and people certainly don't call it such.

Some people probably call anything greater than standard definition "HD"
 
(and yes, anything above standard definition is, by definition, high definition)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-definition_video - Read the external links, if you like.

All I'm saying is: Who decided that, anyway? :p

Does it make sense to come up with HD and then market something else as "true" HD?

What's the point of designing something to be a lie from the day it was invented? :D

Ah, well. You're right. It being chosen as a content standard is all that matters.
 
Does it make sense to come up with HD and then market something else as "true" HD?

What's the point of designing something to be a lie from the day it was invented? :D

Only Sony's Marketing team, my friend. Only Sony's marketing team dubbed 1080p as "true" HD. ;)

How that caught on is beyond me.

And yes, for the record, I'd love it if the MacBook had a higher res screen - 1920 x 1080 would be oh so tasty.
 
1920x1200 (It's 16:10, remember?) on a 13.3" screen would be murder without resolution independence, don't you think? :rolleyes: Can you imagine the cursor size?

hahah, ya. Some serious resolution independence would be in order.

But still ... could you imagine? Watching some crazy 1080p, full colour bit-depth content on it? It'd be *nuts*.

Thank god video playback is GPU assisted now ;)
 
so guys, if i was to download some hd content or buy a HD DVD, they would play in HD?
 
so guys, if i was to download some hd content or buy a HD DVD, they would play in HD?

If you're downloading HD content, such as movies or trailers from Apple.com, always get the 720p option.

It's a smaller file, less CPU intensive and will look best on the MacBook screen.
 
on anything smaller than maybe a 37-42" screen you wont notice a difference in the quality between 720p and 1080i
 
what about connecting the mb to an external display or tv. Would it be able to play full HD?
 
on anything smaller than maybe a 37-42" screen you wont notice a difference in the quality between 720p and 1080i


hi! im buying a macbook pro 15" i5 this moth or the next (my first mac, very excied :) ), and im thinking on getting the extra hi res display (1680-by-1050), is it really worth it or will it look the same?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.