It doesn't have an HD screen, anyway.
oh so if one was to download some HD movies, it would play in HD?
What are you talking about?
MacBook - 1280 by 800 (native)
720p (aka HD) - 1280 by 720
HD is 1920x1080 (1920x1200, 16:10) and up. I don't really see why people call 720p HD. Just because it's larger than what has been deemed standard definition? By that logic 1440x900 is HD and people certainly don't call it such.
HD is 1920x1080 (1920x1200, 16:10) and up. I don't really see why people call 720p HD. Just because it's larger than what has been deemed standard definition? By that logic 1440x900 is HD and people certainly don't call it such.
It plays HD videos very nicely... Go to YouTube and watch a video in High Definition and you'll see a difference.. It looks great!
(and yes, anything above standard definition is, by definition, high definition)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-definition_video - Read the external links, if you like.
Does it make sense to come up with HD and then market something else as "true" HD?
What's the point of designing something to be a lie from the day it was invented?![]()
And yes, for the record, I'd love it if the MacBook had a higher res screen - 1920 x 1080 would oh so tasty.
1920x1200 (It's 16:10, remember?) on a 13.3" screen would be murder without resolution independence, don't you think?Can you imagine the cursor size?
so guys, if i was to download some hd content or buy a HD DVD, they would play in HD?
so guys, if i was to download some hd content or buy a HD DVD, they would play in HD?
on anything smaller than maybe a 37-42" screen you wont notice a difference in the quality between 720p and 1080i