How are they "obviously" inferior?BOE screens are obviously inferior. If I'm spending $1,200 on a phone obviously I want a Samsung display.
Since they‘re obviously inferior, you should easily be able to tell the difference, no?BOE screens are obviously inferior. If I'm spending $1,200 on a phone obviously I want a Samsung display.
It's made by a disgusting Chinese company, while Samsung is Korean.How are they "obviously" inferior?
In 2020, Chinese BOE was supposed to be a supplier of displays for iPhone 12. The quality did not meet Apple standards so the contract was cancelled. Any displays that were produced were then used by Apple’s refurb program For replacement displays.What’s wrong with BOEing displays ???
So you can have a top grade screen instead of a second grade screenWhy would I want to know this?
The quality did not meet Apple standards so the contract was cancelled.
Chinese BOE display.
second grade screen
So you can have a top grade screen instead of a second grade screen
In 2020, Chinese BOE was supposed to be a supplier of displays for iPhone 12. The quality did not meet Apple standards so the contract was cancelled. Any displays that were produced were then used by Apple’s refurb program For replacement displays.
Samsung invented AMOLED mobile displays and is obviously the undisputed leader in quality, R&D, and technology.
If they’re obviously inferior you should be able to see the difference.BOE screens are obviously inferior. If I'm spending $1,200 on a phone obviously I want a Samsung display.
Please provide citations for the three claims in the first three sentences.
And even that wouldn’t be enough to make an objective evaluation of display quality in 2022.
BOE did try to supply Apple, but were never successful in 2020. They then got accreditation then lost it again. Then suggestions when they get it back they may only supply refurb but nothing concrete was stated.
Their post has some validity but there’s a lot of “maybes” stated as fact
If the supplier passed apples inspections and meets the quality requirements. Then it’s fine.Thanks for the links. I agree, this is all plenty of speculation talk treated as facts. And as I wrote that doesn’t necessarily have any meaning for the quality of the displays used on a later product two years down the line.
In 2020, Chinese BOE was supposed to be a supplier of displays for iPhone 12. The quality did not meet Apple standards so the contract was cancelled. Any displays that were produced were then used by Apple’s refurb program For replacement displays.
Samsung invented AMOLED mobile displays and is obviously the undisputed leader in quality, R&D, and technology.
If the supplier passed apples inspections and meets the quality requirements. Then it’s fine.