Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

vb7200

macrumors member
Original poster
Jul 21, 2014
40
5
New York
So I was wondering how fast these things really are. The processor in mine isn't a screamer (2.4 GHz dual-core i5 Haswell). Does the PCIe storage and Haswell architecture really speed the thing up that much compared to a regular HDD and an Ivy Bridge chip?
 
So I was wondering how fast these things really are. The processor in mine isn't a screamer (2.4 GHz dual-core i5 Haswell). Does the PCIe storage and Haswell architecture really speed the thing up that much compared to a regular HDD and an Ivy Bridge chip?
Yes. It does.
The 2.4 i5 haswell is a screamer!
 
Is there really that big of a difference? I know flash is a lot faster data transfer wise but I thought Haswell was only supposed to improve battery life?
the pcie-ssd haswell combo is a screamer.
What more could you want?
 
I just stuck a 4x PCIe SSD in my late 2013 rMBP and the read write speeds are excellent, much faster than stock.

So as aftermarket drives come out that can utilize the bandwidth, the i/o performance will be pretty awesome.
 
So I was wondering how fast these things really are. The processor in mine isn't a screamer (2.4 GHz dual-core i5 Haswell). Does the PCIe storage and Haswell architecture really speed the thing up that much compared to a regular HDD and an Ivy Bridge chip?

Biggest difference is the PCIe storage compared to hard disk.

The Haswell CPU is barely faster than Ivy Bridge (overall 5-10%).
 
I just stuck a 4x PCIe SSD in my late 2013 rMBP and the read write speeds are excellent, much faster than stock.

So as aftermarket drives come out that can utilize the bandwidth, the i/o performance will be pretty awesome.
Thats what I always say. Pcie is capable of much more. Thats why its good the mbs are upgradeable that way.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.