Anyone know how long Lightroom 5 will be available for full purchase from Adobe?
Your question has two parts (1) when will LR 6 be available? I guess in about a year and (2) will Adobe continue to SELL LR at all or will they move to the rental model. I think this second question will depend on if Apple's new "Photos" app gives LR any competition. If Adobe has competition they will continue to sell LR but if not, I bet they move to subscription-only. We will not see Photos until 2015.
The short answer: "I'd guess at least a year."
They're not complete robots, it seems they got you to buy into the subscription model of LR.Hahahahahaha. I just had this chat with an Adobe representative talking about Creative Cloud where he just gets me to place an order and has very little sympathy for my plight. I can't stand "customer service" people they're just like robots....
The more I think about it, the more I'm disliking that whole idea paying per month for LightRoom.
Yeah, since I never fully converted over to LR, I have the freedom of choosing what works best for me.I won't given any choice, specially since I never use PS and LR for iPad does not do plugins. For me this is not a compelling package at all.
your best bet is to use the current version until you find a replacement and then cut over to the new version for new stuff and keep LR just for the old stuff.If LR moves to a subscription model only, I'm going to throw up in my mouth. I've been using LR since the 1st beta, so it'd be hard for me to move my photos to any other product (e.g. Aperture), and yet it'd be necessary.
That's me as well, I'm just a hobbyist and I don't want to spend a lot of money or time dealing with this stuff, but I seem to be at this point.Like many others, I do photography as a hobby, and not something I do frequently anymore. I'll probably be picking up the pace and getting into photography a bit more, but I can go months without using LR. Months. Then, I'll use it 30 hours in a single month. I'd feel better owning it. I'll pay. I don't care. I just don't want to rent.
I'm not sure it's such a bad deal. The only problem I see with it is if you stop using the program and stop paying, you can't really access your image library anymore. Though I guess there are ways to export it properly as the images in the library aren't in a proprietary format.
At 120$ a year you get Photoshop vs the 80$/year upgrade plus 150$ initially. Surely not really the best for amateurs who rarely use it and don't care for PS - vote with your wallet, get another DAM.
I'm not sure what the fuss is all about. I'm also a hobbyist and $10 per month for a hobby I enjoy is cheap. It works out to 33 cents per day. I spend way more than that on coffee each week.![]()
I'm not sure it's such a bad deal. The only problem I see with it is if you stop using the program and stop paying, you can't really access your image library anymore. Though I guess there are ways to export it properly as the images in the library aren't in a proprietary format.
At 120$ a year you get Photoshop vs the 80$/year upgrade plus 150$ initially. Surely not really the best for amateurs who rarely use it and don't care for PS - vote with your wallet, get another DAM.
They say that it will work now, but once they get most of the photographers to buy into the subscription model, there's no guarantee that they'll keep doing that.Lightroom continues to work but you cannot access the Develop and Maps module. You have full access to the Library module and can still import/export and move files around.
They say that it will work now, but once they get most of the photographers to buy into the subscription model, there's no guarantee that they'll keep doing that.
I'd rather not spend 120 dollars a year just for the right to edit my images.
Plus, we all would be foolish to think that the 10 dollar a month price will remain 10 dollars. Everything increases in price over time, at some point Adobe will say they reluctantly need to increase the price, and pretty soon that will be an annual occurrence.
They say that it will work now, but once they get most of the photographers to buy into the subscription model, there's no guarantee that they'll keep doing that.
I'd rather not spend 120 dollars a year just for the right to edit my images.
Plus, we all would be foolish to think that the 10 dollar a month price will remain 10 dollars. Everything increases in price over time, at some point Adobe will say they reluctantly need to increase the price, and pretty soon that will be an annual occurrence.
I'd rather not spend 120 dollars a year just for the right to edit my images.
My problem with Adobe's $10 subscription is that MOST people do not need Photoshop. The $10 includes LR and PS and if you need PS is is a great deal, a bargain really. But if you only want LR you are paying to much.
My problem with Adobe's $10 subscription is that MOST people do not need Photoshop. The $10 includes LR and PS and if you need PS is is a great deal, a bargain really. But if you only want LR you are paying to much.
The LR & PS $10/month deal is a good one if you use both. If you have no interest in PS then just buy LR outright.
"Outright" realistically means it will work for ~5 years because that's about how long before an OS or other software upgrade will break it), not forever.