Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

himynameiscody

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Oct 9, 2011
765
0
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A405 Safari/7534.48.3)

Between speed and how it effects battery. Worth toggling it on and off? Also what carrier.
 
Traditionally, wifi will have lower latency and faster data speeds, unless the wifi network is painfully slow in general or has it's own problems. Furthermore, it's advantageous to use wifi instead of 3G, as it saves your data usage.

In other words, always keep wifi on so that your phone will utilize it wherever possible, as it really doesn't drain the battery and will provide faster loading times.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A405 Safari/7534.48.3)

Dwalls90 said:
Traditionally, wifi will have lower latency and faster data speeds, unless the wifi network is painfully slow in general or has it's own problems. Furthermore, it's advantageous to use wifi instead of 3G, as it saves your data usage.

In other words, always keep wifi on so that your phone will utilize it wherever possible, as it really doesn't drain the battery and will provide faster loading times.

What do you mean by latency?
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A405 Safari/7534.48.3)



What do you mean by latency?

Cody, I wrote you a haiku:

WiFi is Good.
Free data saves you money.
It is faster too.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A405 Safari/7534.48.3)

Another user said 3G was faster....I take it that it varies quite a bit
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A405 Safari/7534.48.3)

It depends upon the wireless routers Internet connection speed. Like it has already been said, unless the wifi connection is painfully slow it will more often than not be fast than 3G. Wifi also uses less battery life that 3G.
 
It depends on where you are, but 9/10 times I find Wifi to be the superior choice over 3G. Both in terms of speed AND battery life.

For me 3G tends to be around 2 or 3 Mbps and my wifi at home gets me more like 20 or 25. Even "slow" public wifi tends to be around 4 or 5.

What do you mean by latency?

A) Imagine a car that can go from 0 - 60 instantly but that's as fast as it can go.

B) Now imagine a car that can go 90, but it takes 5 minutes to get going that fast.


Car A has low latency but also low speed.
Car B has high latency but also a higher speed.

Which would you rather have? Well, if I'm going 3 miles away car A is the clear winner. But if I'm driving 3,000 miles across the country I'd rather have car B.

So to put it in iPhone terms, having "car" A is great for e-mail and web sites and other small files. But "car" B is better for downloading large photos or streaming videos.

But of course, having choice 'C' (a car with low latency AND high speeds) is best. But I'm explaining it by showing you an 'either-or' case. Often in the real world you DON'T have to pick and can, in fact, get the best of both without having to pick.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A405 Safari/7534.48.3)

Small White Car said:
It depends on where you are, but 9/10 times I find Wifi to be the superior choice over 3G. Both in terms of speed AND battery life.

For me 3G tends to be around 2 or 3 Mbps and my wifi at home gets me more like 20 or 25. Even "slow" public wifi tends to be around 4 or 5.

What do you mean by latency?

A) Imagine a car that can go from 0 - 60 instantly but that's as fast as it can go.

B) Now imagine a car that can go 90, but it takes 5 minutes to get going that fast.


Car A has low latency but also low speed.
Car B has high latency but also a higher speed.

Which would you rather have? Well, if I'm going 3 miles away car A is the clear winner. But if I'm driving 3,000 miles across the country I'd rather have car B.

So to put it in iPhone terms, having "car" A is great for e-mail and web sites and other small files. But "car" B is better for downloading large photos or streaming videos.

But of course, having choice 'C' (a car with low latency AND high speeds) is best. But I'm explaining it by showing you an 'either-or' case. Often in the real world you DON'T have to pick and can, in fact, get the best of both without having to pick.

Well put!
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A405 Safari/7534.48.3)

saving107 said:
OP, do you have to start a thread for every question that pops into your head?

No or else I would of asked for advice on making a move on my sister
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A405 Safari/7534.48.3)



No or else I would of asked for advice on making a move on my sister

epic-jackie-chan-template.png
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.