Yes, how much space does it take..and why does my hard drive say available 27.94 GB when its capacity is 30 GB..? Is this difference equal to the space taken by the OS?
thanks
thanks
This is a good clear explanation, but you reversed the terms; hard drive manufacturers give sizes in Gigabytes (multiples of ten, hence 30GB=30 million bytes), while the OS (both the MacOS and Windows, for whatever reason) use Gibibytes, which are a bit bigger (hence 30GB = ~27GiB).Originally posted by HexMonkey
When the manufacturer says that it's a 30 GB hard drive, what they actually mean is that it is a 30 gibibyte hard drive, or contains 30 000 000 000 bytes. The OS then displays this in GB, so it looks like less (about 27 GB).
I'm a fan of clean installs, but if you archive and install you can delete the old system when you're done. Then it takes up no space.Originally posted by wordmunger
However, if you do an archive and install, it's going to be a lot bigger--because your old system is still intact, plus all the libraries will be copied over to the new system. So it really could be *much* bigger. That's part of why it's a good idea to do a clean install.
Originally posted by Horrortaxi
I'm a fan of clean installs, but if you archive and install you can delete the old system when you're done. Then it takes up no space.
Sorry to be vague, but you got me right. 27.94 GB is the total capacity of the harddrive shown in activity monitor or info.Originally posted by HexMonkey
TYou're a little vague in your explanation of the hard disk space. Is this with an empty disk? If so, then the reason is probably to do with gigabytes (10^9) and gibibytes (2^30). When the manufacturer says that it's a 30 GB hard drive, what they actually mean is that it is a 30 gibibyte hard drive, or contains 30 000 000 000 bytes. The OS then displays this in GB, so it looks like less (about 27 GB).
It's a good thought, but System Profiler et al report the full, empty size--system files are files just like everything else, so they don't affect the capacity reported by utilities, only the amount of free space left.Originally posted by abhishekit
Also, as I noted most guys said, the OS takes about 2 GB, and the difference in the numbers between the capacity on my ibook is 2.06 GB. And I have x11. So may it be possible that the capacity shown is after systema llocation..Just a thought
As far as your newly installed system being bloated by your old system files being moved over, probably only by a little bit--what gets moved are preferences, fonts, and some (not all) other system utilities/extension type stuff, which for most people only amount to a few dozen megabytes at most. So although your upgraded system will be a bit larger than a virgin one, once you delete the previous system folder the difference is probably minimal.Originally posted by wordmunger
But aren't the libraries, fonts, etc, copied over? So it could conceivably be very large, even if you delete the old system. And why would you delete it if you did an archive and install? Isn't the point to archive it so you can revert to the old system if you find an unacceptable problem with the new version? So wouldn't you want to keep it for a month or two, just to be sure? This would be a problem if you were low on HD space.
Originally posted by TMA
I'm wondering if there are further foreign language files I can remove (I remember there used to be utilities to do this) or if the Installer did this already.
Originally posted by wordmunger
But aren't the libraries, fonts, etc, copied over? So it could conceivably be very large, even if you delete the old system. And why would you delete it if you did an archive and install? Isn't the point to archive it so you can revert to the old system if you find an unacceptable problem with the new version? So wouldn't you want to keep it for a month or two, just to be sure? This would be a problem if you were low on HD space.