Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

HappyDude20

macrumors 68040
Original poster
Jul 13, 2008
3,688
1,479
Los Angeles, Ca
Just wondering if it’s free at Tesla charging stations?


I’m guessing it’s probably a fraction of the price if someone charges at home nightly versus filling up a gas tank.

i read recently that some guy charged his Tesla only at supercharging stations and saved somewhere along the line of a few thousand bucks in one year.
 
I can't answer first hand, but something I've looked at a few times and that you will honestly need to both research and crunch the numbers on yourself.

For a while, Tesla offered free and unlimited supercharging either bundled with the car or as an add on purchase-I forget the details on this but a lot of older Model Ss and other cars do have that. It use to stay with the car for the life of it, but it started disappearing on cars that originally sold with it and then were resold as used through Tesla. There was also some controversy when it started going away on cars that were sold privately, but I haven't kept up with it. In any case, free and unlimited supercharging, if you want it, is something that you're going to basically have to find on a used private sale and over the next several years the number of cars in circulation that have it is going to decrease.

As I understand it, other superchargers bill you at more-or-less the prevailing electric rate for the area(which may not be the same as the residential rate you pay). Some quick Google searching shows that current prices run 10¢ to 30¢ per kWh, with 20-25¢ seemingly being a common rate. The article I'm referencing for these prices(https://www.newsweek.com/tesla-hikes-supercharger-prices-how-much-each-state-will-cost-840143) claims it would be $22 to fully charge an 85kWh Model S from empty, although I'm guessing doing that is not typical either. Back if the envelope math tells me that 40kWh(or about half the capacity of the same car) at 20¢ per would be $8.

One thing I'm not totally clear on-battery charging is far from a perfectly efficient process, and I'd expect charging an 85kWh battery from empty to take 100kWh or better. I'm not sure if the Superchargers bill you on what goes into your car or what they deliver out the line-the technology is certainly there to measure both values.

As for how that compares to home charging-here in Louisville, KY my last electric bill shows 9.25¢/kWh. Using my hypothetical 100kWh to charge an 85kWh car from dead, that comes in at $9.25 to charge at home. I can't find what the rate at the one Supercharger in town is-it would not surprise me if it's somewhat more expensive than that.

One last cost too-its in Teslas best interest for you to not "park" your car at a Supercharger for an extended length of time, and I'm also finding references to a $1/minute "idle fee" for if your car is parked there but not actively charging. That fee is apparently waved if you move within 5 minutes of your car finishing charging. Still, though, that can definitely add up quickly if you hook your car up, go get a meal or something along those lines, and let it sit for an extended time before going back to get it.
 
Last edited:
Tesla (specifically: I've not looked at any other manufacturers but I'd guess most are similar) varies from as poor as 80% to as good as almost 90% on the one specific car this post references.

This makes sense as the batteries get hot charging and that heat is wasted energy. However I am pretty surprised at the lower figure. To be wasting 1/5 of the energy is pretty bad.
 
I have a 2019 Model X Performance under the new naming scheme, or P100D w/ Ludicrous under the older name.
I have not been "staring" at my electricity bills the last several months but it I know it has not changed much at all. Maybe $30 give or take a month.
My plan switches often depending on who offers cheaper electricity, so it constantly searches for cheaper options and auto changes.

As for Free charging at Superchargers. I get 100% free supercharging for the life of the vehicle. The closest to me is about 12 minutes away and I would use it twice a week when I first got the car because I didn't have a higher speed charger at home installed yet.
We travel about 400 miles to my in-laws house so I use superchargers along the way. I am in no way a conservative driver so I do 80-85 on the highway, the car stays in Ludicrous mode always, so I don't get the absolute best mileage but the superchargers are so quick that by the time we use the restrooms, grab a snack, take the dogs out to do their business, there is plenty to get to the next charger/stop.
I don't really use Tesla's chargers unless I am actively traveling or doing something so I have never run in to idle fee's, I just charge and go.

If you are buying from Tesla they will tell you if it has Unlimited Supercharging. If from a 3rd party, call or chat with Tesla and give them the VIN and they can tell you also if it's unlimited. Typically most Model S and X are Free for life, there was an amount of time where it was removed but was added back to newer and current models but could be removed again.

I plug the car in at home after every drive. The car regulates what it needs based off of the percentage you choose to charge up to. They recommend 85-90%, go to 100 for long drives.

SuperChargers are quick! When you connect you'll hear the fans on the car kick on to keep air flowing over the batteries as they are being charged at some fairly high rates. Mine will do 135-140kW or around 400miles per hour charging.

If you need/want any other information I'm happy to share.
 
Some utilities will install a smart wallbox for free that charges when the electricity is cheapest.
 
If you’re on SoCal Edison - switching to Time of Use plans really helps the electric bill I’m told (from people who have electric cars that I know). I’m on TOU plans myself but I don’t have electric cars yet. Not sure if LADWP has such a thing (I see you’re in LA).
 
If you’re on SoCal Edison - switching to Time of Use plans really helps the electric bill I’m told (from people who have electric cars that I know). I’m on TOU plans myself but I don’t have electric cars yet. Not sure if LADWP has such a thing (I see you’re in LA).

If you have a PowerWall/battery storage then there are other fun options on TOU tariffs: charge your batter overnight and save on expensive daytime energy :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigMcGuire
Just wondering if it’s free at Tesla charging stations?


I’m guessing it’s probably a fraction of the price if someone charges at home nightly versus filling up a gas tank.

i read recently that some guy charged his Tesla only at supercharging stations and saved somewhere along the line of a few thousand bucks in one year.

Most Tesla owners look at electric bills and see the night deduced rates and schedule charge during those times to save money!
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigMcGuire
If you’re on SoCal Edison - switching to Time of Use plans really helps the electric bill I’m told (from people who have electric cars that I know). I’m on TOU plans myself but I don’t have electric cars yet. Not sure if LADWP has such a thing (I see you’re in LA).
If you have a PowerWall/battery storage then there are other fun options on TOU tariffs: charge your batter overnight and save on expensive daytime energy :)

Using a PowerWall to charge a Tesla seems a bit questionable for me, right now anyways. First of all, a PowerWall is 13.5kw, a fraction of a Tesla’s battery capacity. It’s continuous discharge rate is 5kw, half of the normal house charger (7.6-9.6kw depending on the model)... while the V3 supercharger is 250kw. The discharge is additive, therefore if you have 2 PowerWalls you cloud theoretically charge at 10kw. Otherwise I suppose you could supplement with grid power.

To charge a Tesla with battery power efficiently and with reasonable range, Tesla would have you buy 2 PowerWalls (though you would only be able to do a partial charge). With a PowerWall costing $6700 + $1,100 for additional hardware + at least $2000 for installation (potentially thousands more) you’re looking at ~$16,000 conservatively for 2.

It seems like an awfully expensive investment and considering the lifespan of the system being 10-15 (though there will be degradation obviously in the later years). Additionally, most people would be charging their vehicles at night when demand and electricity rates are lowest as it is... thus you’d only be reducing efficiency and wasting money. If in the future everyone has EV’s they charge at night, I suppose that could change.

Here in Mass the average electricity cost is ~$0.21 per kWh and the average American drives 1250 miles/month (15k miles/year). A Tesla Model S 75D is rated at 250 miles/charge and therefore costs ~$15.75 to charge up and would require 5 charges/month, therefore the cost to charge would be $78.75/month.

If I installed 2 Power walls at a conservative total cost of $16,000, the monthly cost would be $133/month over an estimated 10 year lifespan (I’ve read Tesla has offered 3% financing with $0 down for 10 years = $155/month). It’s important to note that 2x13.5kwh PowerWalls would at best charge 1/3 of a 75kwh Tesla at time before needing its own recharge, though at 15k miles/year or ~40miles/day this usually wouldn’t be a problem if you charge every day/night.

Home power storage for a car really only really makes sense if you have to charge during the day or have solar panels. Assuming 40 miles of driving equates to ~15kwh/day, to be on the safe side using Teslas specs suggest you’d need 7.5kW of their solar panels which in MA costs ~$14,000 with tax credits or ~$21,000 without (30% Federal tax credit expires at the end of 2019). You also have the option of leasing the same solar panel from Tesla for $100/month (plus $1500 removal fee).

If you paid $155/month for the 2 PowerWalls and leased the panels for $100/month that’s a cost of $250/month just charge your Tesla with stores solar... that’s a lot more than the $80/month just to charge your car with grid electricity- and this is considering an average electric cost nearly double the national average and not considering off-peak pricing which can be substantially less.

It only starts making more sense if you outright buy the solar panels ($40-60/month over 30 years) and live in area with expensive grid energy, however you also have to factor in battery replacement costs likely needed every ~10 years (presumably costs per kWh will continue decrease, though it’s believe much of the cost reduction have already been realized, barring substantial technological breakthroughs). On the other hand, it’s reasonable to assume grid power prices will likely continue to increase with increased demand (esp as EV adoption expands) and cheaper energy sources like fossil fuels + presumably nuclear are phased out. There is also the consideration of the opportunity cost of investing now vs later if solar + battery prices decrease.

———
It seems you really have to be doing things on a large scale to have the economics work out... for most consumers it’s kind of a novelty or a very expensive alternative to a backup generator.

My dad is a partner in an investment firm that owns part of a company that makes grid battery energy storage systems, in fact a direct competitor to Tesla’s “PowerPack” (basically a much bigger commercial grid version of PowerWall). A lot of power companies and municipalities are getting into the buy low, sell high battery storage (as well as grid power regulation). Potentially in the future power companies using renewable energy and battery systems will achieve the concept discussed above except on the level of the grid instead of individual homes.

His company looked into home solutions however the market isn’t really there because the economics on a consumer level often don’t add up to be financially effective. Basically it might work if you personally have a very large solar array and a lot of money to invest upfront. Another problem is not all power companies will buy back power, or pay ridiculous low rates, and in some cases require new infrastructure to be built to accommodate accepting the power that is simply affordable to consumers. Many companies have tried the home storage market and failed. Tesla doesn’t sell many PowerWalls as it is and the product largely exists because Tesla is already making batteries and wants to sell as many as possible.

What I do think would be incredible for Tesla would be to allow their vehicles to be used as a home battery backup for power outages. Considering the craziness going on California’s power infrastructure, it would be very practical if people could use their Tesla essentially as a PowerWall backup system. The car could automatically shut off power once it reached a threshold determined by the distance to the nearest supercharger or preset by the owner.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: BigMcGuire
Using a PowerWall to charge a Tesla seems a bit questionable for me, right now anyways. First of all, a PowerWall is 13.5kw, a fraction of a Tesla’s battery capacity. It’s continuous discharge rate is 5kw, half of the normal house charger (7.6-9.6kw depending on the model)... while the V3 supercharger is 250kw. The discharge is additive, therefore if you have 2 PowerWalls you cloud theoretically charge at 10kw. Otherwise I suppose you could supplement with grid power.

To charge a Tesla with battery power efficiently and with reasonable range, Tesla would have you buy 2 PowerWalls (though you would only be able to do a partial charge). With a PowerWall costing $6700 + $1,100 for additional hardware + at least $2000 for installation (potentially thousands more) you’re looking at ~$16,000 conservatively for 2.

It seems like an awfully expensive investment and considering the lifespan of the system being 10-15 (though there will be degradation obviously in the later years). Additionally, most people would be charging their vehicles at night when demand and electricity rates are lowest as it is... thus you’d only be reducing efficiency and wasting money. If in the future everyone has EV’s they charge at night, I suppose that could change.

Here in Mass the average electricity cost is ~$0.21 per kWh and the average American drives 1250 miles/month (15k miles/year). A Tesla Model S 75D is rated at 250 miles/charge and therefore costs ~$15.75 to charge up and would require 5 charges/month, therefore the cost to charge would be $78.75/month.

If I installed 2 Power walls at a conservative total cost of $16,000, the monthly cost would be $133/month over an estimated 10 year lifespan (I’ve read Tesla has offered 3% financing with $0 down for 10 years = $155/month). It’s important to note that 2x13.5kwh PowerWalls would at best charge 1/3 of a 75kwh Tesla at time before needing its own recharge, though at 15k miles/year or ~40miles/day this usually wouldn’t be a problem if you charge every day/night.

Home power storage for a car really only really makes sense if you have to charge during the day or have solar panels. Assuming 40 miles of driving equates to ~15kwh/day, to be on the safe side using Teslas specs suggest you’d need 7.5kW of their solar panels which in MA costs ~$14,000 with tax credits or ~$21,000 without (30% Federal tax credit expires at the end of 2019). You also have the option of leasing the same solar panel from Tesla for $100/month (plus $1500 removal fee).

If you paid $155/month for the 2 PowerWalls and leased the panels for $100/month that’s a cost of $250/month just charge your Tesla with stores solar... that’s a lot more than the $80/month just to charge your car with grid electricity- and this is considering an average electric cost nearly double the national average and not considering off-peak pricing which can be substantially less.

It only starts making more sense if you outright buy the solar panels ($40-60/month over 30 years) and live in area with expensive grid energy, however you also have to factor in battery replacement costs likely needed every ~10 years (presumably costs per kWh will continue decrease, though it’s believe much of the cost reduction have already been realized, barring substantial technological breakthroughs). On the other hand, it’s reasonable to assume grid power prices will likely continue to increase with increased demand (esp as EV adoption expands) and cheaper energy sources like fossil fuels + presumably nuclear are phased out. There is also the consideration of the opportunity cost of investing now vs later if solar + battery prices decrease.

———
It seems you really have to be doing things on a large scale to have the economics work out... for most consumers it’s kind of a novelty or a very expensive alternative to a backup generator.

My dad is a partner in an investment firm that owns part of a company that makes grid battery energy storage systems, in fact a direct competitor to Tesla’s “PowerPack” (basically a much bigger commercial grid version of PowerWall). A lot of power companies and municipalities are getting into the buy low, sell high battery storage (as well as grid power regulation). Potentially in the future power companies using renewable energy and battery systems will achieve the concept discussed above except on the level of the grid instead of individual homes.

His company looked into home solutions however the market isn’t really there because the economics on a consumer level often don’t add up to be financially effective. Basically it might work if you personally have a very large solar array and a lot of money to invest upfront. Another problem is not all power companies will buy back power, or pay ridiculous low rates, and in some cases require new infrastructure to be built to accommodate accepting the power that is simply affordable to consumers. Many companies have tried the home storage market and failed. Tesla doesn’t sell many PowerPacks as it is and the product largely exists because Tesla is already making batteries and wants to sell as many as possible.

What I do think would be incredible for Tesla would be to allow their vehicles to be used as a home battery backup for power outages. Considering the craziness going on California’s power infrastructure, it would be incredibly practical if people could use their Tesla essentially as a PowerWall backup system. The car could automatically shut off power once it reached a threshold determined by the distance to the nearest supercharger or preset by the owner.

Agreed. It is not financially viable to use Tesla Powerwalls to charge a Tesla - that I agree with 100%. I'm the guy that has 6 Anker batteries to charge my iPhone and iPad because I love batteries so much. I solar charge some of them with my 21 watt Anker solar panels when I have the time.

I'd be getting a Powerwall for my iPhone. <cough>. But I can't afford one, let alone a Tesla. lol.

What an awesome post - really enjoyed reading it - thanks for taking the time to write it. Will be reading it again soon. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: A.Goldberg
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.