Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

pianodude123

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Mar 1, 2005
698
0
in the internet
So it seems as if I have come to a roadblock.

My house requires 4 wireless access points / routers in order to have decent signal in key places around the house. I currently have a mix of G + N routers and a mix of G + N capable computers. Currently, our cable hookup comes in through the basement, and that is where our internet lives... in the basement. However, if I were to have wires run throughout the house to the places where the wireless access points should be located, I am wondering whether this configuration would provide for optimal speed and cost.

If I take the cable modem --> 4 port router/switch --> 24 port netgear 10/100/1000 switch/hub (what's the difference?) and then from the netgear have an assortment of wired connections and wireless routers/switches that I already own (some gigabit, some not) placed throughout the house where I need them. I have heard that having multiple routers/switches/hubs on the network slows down the overall speed of the network. Is this true?

Also, if I walk from room to room with my laptop, will it automatically pick the best wirless router to take the signal from, like a cell tower? what if I am on a wireless voip phone? will it be able to switch access points without interruption?

if I have some non - N routers on the network, does this cause the N routers to function at slower G speeds?

I know that this is a lot of questions, but thank you for helping.
 
You might want to set the wifi signal channel manually to 1, 6, 11 to minimize interference.

Use cat 5e or cat 6 cable for gigabit ethernet. I would try to run at least a couple of cables to each room if possible.
 
Okay, but what about the other questions... will it slow the entire network down if I add more switches/hubs?

a hub shares available bandwidth across all ports - it rebroadcasts all traffic to each port. a switch does not do this. it is kind of like a router in a way, it directs the packets to the appropriate MAC address attached to a specific port. depending on topology and where traffic is coming from in your network, there may be more... efficient ways to connect the multiple switches, but you should be fine. I doubt you'll be running so much bandwidth as to saturate a switch.

as for adding additional WAP's, no, it will not slow down the speed of the network collectively. what might happen is interference between bands /wireless channels on the different AP's. if you follow the advice in the post above about spacing them out appropriately on separate channels, you'll be alright. but as for the wired network, unless you run the cables next to power lines / etc, you're safe to bet on getting what you pay for (10/100/1000). just make sure if you do go the gigabit route that you have adequate cabling.
 
you may also want to try using different antennas. changing antennas and locations of the access points can make a huge difference. I replaced the standard antenna that came with my dlink antenna and purchased the one of the indoor omni-directional antennas and relocated the access point. This increased the signal and speed for all of the wireless computers in our home.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.