i kinda was, maybe around 1700-1800, but at 2k, its only 500 bucks cheaper than the 16inch.It’s only ram and storage that are expensive - and this has been true for years. I don’t know why people are surprised by these prices. I understand the 14” a bit - but it’s also a larger MacBook so it was assumed they would raise prices compared to the high-end 13”
Nobody was expecting anything under $1,799 who understands the Mac product line.
My only thing is, at this point, the 13" barely serves a purpose in the product lineup. It's way too similar to the Macbook air in terms of specs/design/ports unless you really max it out.It’s only ram and storage that are expensive - and this has been true for years. I don’t know why people are surprised by these prices. I understand the 14” a bit - but it’s also a larger MacBook so it was assumed they would raise prices compared to the high-end 13”
Nobody was expecting anything under $1,799 who understands the Mac product line.
The 14" is $200 cheaper for equivalent spec which is totally consistent considering they are the exact same computer now, same processors, same display technology, same speakers...the 16inch price is not bad, but the 14inch...ouch
My only thing is, at this point, the 13" barely serves a purpose in the product lineup. It's way too similar to the Macbook air in terms of specs/design/ports unless you really max it out.
It almost feels like it should be discontinued completely and that the 14" should be priced a couple hundred bucks lower. It's as if it only exists, because we've always been used to having a 1200 "Macbook Pro", and they don't want to change that status quo. But with the release of the new pros, it kinda like the 13" pro, really isn't a "pro" model anymore at all. Just my two cents.
Hmm, fair, but I kinda disagree. I feel like business professionals would prefer those extra ports that come with the new 14" pro and would just bit the bullet for the higher cost laptop.Most business professionals want a 13 or 14-inch model with the best battery life possible. M1 Pro is overkill for those users. There’s plenty of room for the 13” Pro.
I wonder if they'll upgrade the 13 with chips for a few years before phasing them out. They need to keep a lower price point for struggling professionals.Hmm, fair, but I kinda disagree. I feel like business professionals would prefer those extra ports that come with the new 14" pro and would just bit the bullet for the higher cost laptop.
But I also work in a PC dominated industry, so I may just be out of my element here.
i'm talking about 14 base vs 16 base, which is only 500 bucks difference, that gap was alot bigger in the past.The 14" is $200 cheaper for equivalent spec which is totally consistent considering they are the exact same computer now, same processors, same display technology, same speakers...
Hmm, fair, but I kinda disagree. I feel like business professionals would prefer those extra ports that come with the new 14" pro and would just bit the bullet for the higher cost laptop.
But I also work in a PC dominated industry, so I may just be out of my element here.
Edited*i kinda was, maybe around 1700-1800, but at 2k, its only 500 bucks cheaper than the 16inch.
Yeah this. The only "better" thing about the 16" is a larger built-in display, but the whole point of these laptops is that they can power multiple external displays when necessary, while being portable and powerful. The 14" is much better for portability and has no compromises on the ability to drive external displays. So..for me it's actually the superior device, and it's a bonus that it's cheaper..The 14" is $200 cheaper for equivalent spec which is totally consistent considering they are the exact same computer now, same processors, same display technology, same speakers...