Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I've seen this in a few places - notably the BBC news site, so I guess that it is reliable here. You do have a point though - Wikipedia is generally pretty reliable, but can sometimes be far from definitive.

p.s. the title of this thread really made me laugh.
 
The planet is estimated to be about five times Earth's mass (5.5+5.5?2.7 M?). Some astronomers have speculated that it may have a rocky core like Earth, with a thin atmosphere. Its distance from the star, and the star's relatively low temperature, means that the planet's likely surface temperature is around 53 K (?220 °C, ?364 °F). If it is a rocky world, this temperature would make it likely that the surface would be made of frozen volatiles, substances which would be liquids or gases on Earth: water, ammonia, methane and nitrogen would all be frozen solid. If it is not a rocky planet, it would more closely resemble an icy gas planet like Uranus, although much smaller. [2]

Earth like is relative - 5x Mass means higher gravity and those temps aren't going to be any more favorable to life as we know it.

Still cool though.

D
 
Mr. Anderson said:
Earth like is relative - 5x Mass means higher gravity and those temps aren't going to be any more favorable to life as we know it.

Still cool though.

D
Yea it kinda makes me sad that the most earthlike planet discovered to date is still completely incapable of supporting life, at least as far as we know. I mean, as far I can tell from this article, the only things that are similar between this planet and Earth are its small(ish) size and how far away it is from its star...
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.