Yes, it uses digital zoom for 2x, focusing on the center area of the sensor, providing a full 12 megapixel image- so it is not poor quality as a 2x digital zoom might typically be- it truly provides good results. This is possible because of the larger 48 megapixel sensor.
The 3x, though, just uses the 3x lens on the camera- this is not digital zoom.
Ah, thank you for that clarification! That's what I was trying to say but completely whiffed on using the right terminology.Not zoom, x2 is a crop of x1.
I would say yes. 13 Pro digital zoom is traditional digital zoom, which is just plain cropping 1x photo, thus the result is lesser quality. 14 Pro digital zoom is lossless, it's still digital zoom by cropping, but since the sensor size is bigger, the 2x still uses full 12MP pixels.better than 13 pro?
But the 2x have poor quality because of smaller CMOS area and smaller pixel size, which means that less light will be captured.Yes, it uses digital zoom for 2x, focusing on the center area of the sensor, providing a full 12 megapixel image- so it is not poor quality as a 2x digital zoom might typically be- it truly provides good results. This is possible because of the larger 48 megapixel sensor.
The 3x, though, just uses the 3x lens on the camera- this is not digital zoom.
You have a point, but imo post processing can compensate. There are also a lot of tech on the newer sensor that pixel size is not necessarily a deciding factor. I mean we can look even at DSLRs/mirrorless, where today's high MP sensors technically have much smaller pixel size than the old sensors, but picture quality is still better due to other factors and technology improvements.But the 2x have poor quality because of smaller CMOS area and smaller pixel size, which means that less light will be captured.