Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
would you not have just as good loctaion finding on ipad as gps?

This statement is based more on intuition that actual data, but I think a device that talks to one satellite continuously is going to be more reliable than something that has to switch from one cell tower to another as you move.

I'm totally open to being told this theory is wrong, though. <3 my Garmin.
 
This statement is based more on intuition that actual data, but I think a device that talks to one satellite continuously is going to be more reliable than something that has to switch from one cell tower to another as you move.

I'm totally open to being told this theory is wrong, though. <3 my Garmin.

Your right. The wifi version, like the ipod touch, is going to be inaccurate because it does not use satellite data.
 
would you not have just as good loctaion finding on ipad as gps?

The wifi iPad wouldn't have access to any of the location data on the phone. It would think it's connected to a wifi network, because that is all it sees.

Depending where you are, wifi location services aren't necessarily very accurate. Where I live, it's not accurate at all.
 
The answer is No.

1) GPS is more accurate and works away from hotspots. The only exception would be is if you're sitting right next to a perfectly mapped hotspot, which would be a rare thing.

2) A phone or MiFi hotspot can't be used for locating, since it's usually constantly moving and would not be mapped to one location by Skyhook.
 
This statement is based more on intuition that actual data, but I think a device that talks to one satellite continuously is going to be more reliable than something that has to switch from one cell tower to another as you move.

I'm totally open to being told this theory is wrong, though. <3 my Garmin.


Gps devices do not talk to satellites in any way.
 
Gps devices do not talk to satellites in any way.
But the satellites "talk" to the GPS device.

The answer to the OP's question is:

No. The wifi-only iPad has no GPS chip, so it cannot receive geolocation information from the GPS satellites.

A company called SkyHook as gone around the country and mapped the location of many fixed WiFi hotspots. So, if your iPad is connected to a hotspot at, say, Starbucks, then the Google Maps app will identify your location.

But, if someone were to pick up and move that Starbuck's equipment to a new location, then the Google Maps app will mislocate you (or at least until SkyHook, Inc. remaps that hotspots location).

Devices like the MiFi don't pass the cell tower information to the connected device (or at least I've not found a way to do it with my Verizon MiFi).

The 3G-enabled iPads include a GPS chip just like the iPhone does, and can use GPS, cell-tower triangulation and SkyHook for geolocation.
 
Devices like the MiFi don't pass the cell tower information to the connected device (or at least I've not found a way to do it with my Verizon MiFi).

You are correct, the location data would not pass. That's not the function of an access point so it wouldn't be possible. The only way to make it possible is to have an application running on the phone device that sends NMEA data but then you'd need to have an NMEA data aware application that knew to look for inbound location data and utilize it. That would require rewriting on both ends and the navigation and location-aware developers aren't going to develop for something that doesn't have guaranteed availability like an internal GPS chip itself. I don't know if the iPhone development environment even supports inbound NMEA data that has nothing to do with an internal GPS chip at all.

At to the OP's post, that would be a bit like saying a blender should make toast since it's plugged into the same electrical circuit as the toaster. The mifi has its defined function and the ipad has it's own. You can't make the iPad wi-fi connection GPS-aware when the architecture between the two doesn't exist.
 
The answer is No.

1) GPS is more accurate and works away from hotspots. The only exception would be is if you're sitting right next to a perfectly mapped hotspot, which would be a rare thing.

2) A phone or MiFi hotspot can't be used for locating, since it's usually constantly moving and would not be mapped to one location by Skyhook.

OK, except that apparently this isn't true. The iPhone does appear to pass some kind of location data to the iPad when tethered. I would guess that the GPS lock the phone gets gives it specific coordinates, which then get passed to the iPad as the location of the WiFi spot it's talking to.

http://blog.urbanape.com/post/3798485232/show-me-the-way
http://www.tabletmonsters.com/news/video-wi-fi-only-ipad-2-gps-navigation
 
OK, except that apparently this isn't true. The iPhone does appear to pass some kind of location data to the iPad when tethered. I would guess that the GPS lock the phone gets gives it specific coordinates, which then get passed to the iPad as the location of the WiFi spot it's talking to.

Thanks. Very interesting. The question is, how is the tethering iPhone's location transmitted to the iPad. Some out of band comms, perhaps? A special port number?

Since it only updates once a minute, it makes me wonder if it's done this way:

(First off, I mentioned Skyhook's hotspot servers, but Apple dropped Skyhook and now uses their own WiFi location database.)

The iPhone, knowing it's in tethering mode, could constantly (once a minute those tests seem to say) send its location up to Apple's location servers.

So when the iPad sends its usual location request to Apple's servers , they could simply respond with the current GPS location of the iPhone associated with the hotspot's MAC address.

We need to do some WiFi packet sniffing :)
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.