Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

iperson21

macrumors regular
Original poster
Jun 17, 2010
129
0
im a little confused here on which is better (the title doesn't really match my thread, but i didn't know how to describe it)
a high GHZ C2D, like that super power one thats 3.1Ghz or a low GHZ which i've seen in a lot of dell notebooks, like a 1.6ghz one.
so which one would see more improvance in everyday tasks and which one for heavy tasks such as movie/photo editing?
 
The 2.66 i7 will be much faster than the 2.66 C2D. This is a difference in architecture and a few other features that it includes. They both have two cores and are the same clock speed, but the i7 has turbo boost, hyperthreading and a 32nm process rather than 45nm.
 
i know that, but how does a low ghz i7 compare to a high ghz C2d.

The i7 can turbo past the C2D in most cases (GHz).

The i7 also performs better per a GHz.

The exception to this is the i7 low voltage series, which pretty much just goofs the naming scheme.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.