sorryiwasdreami said:
To me, having all the ports on the back makes the machine much less obtrusive, while not disregarding functionality, but rather emphasising the design concept.
At first glance of the back, even the order in which Ives layed out the ports exudes fluidity and movement. The ports flow back and forth from small to large sizes intrinsically.
Not to say they couldn't have done something similar on the side; (space issues inside the machine?) however, wires and cables protruding from the side is less desirable from a visual cleanliness standpoint.
Although I am not much a fan of it, the large "iMac" light grey logo on the upper back further proves that the designer wanted the viewer to notice it's rear.
Overall, I think it's a thing of beauty.
I agree yes, that overall it is a thing of beauty. Shoot, if I had the money I'd buy one, I think they are very sleek and functional, besides having every port in the back.
You're contradicting yourself saying that the ports on the back make it less obtrusive and then saying that the designer wanted people to see the back of it.
Well I guess if you don't have a keyboard, mouse, printer, ipod cable, or headphones plugged in, then yea it would be attractive from the back. But with the cables plugged in, how is the back any more attractive than the previous imacs, besides having the "iMac" logo?
That's like putting diamonds on the back of a powermac with all the cables connected and coming out of it and saying here isn't it beautiful now? Who looks at a computer from the back like that if there's cords coming out of it?
P.S. putting one USB/firewire and a headphone jack on the side/bottom wouldn't take away from the fluidity of the rear jacks. From top to bottom it's 1. optical line, 2. headphone jack, 3. mini DVI, 4.USB 5.USB, 6.USB, 7.Firewire, 8.Firewire, 9. Phone, 10. Ethernet. Removing the headphone, and one USB wouldn't hurt the fluidity, since theres 3 USB ports, and the optical line jack is the same size as the headphone jack.