I have this website I'm developing and I am unsure whether I am breaking a law involving image copyright. Basically, one feature is for the user to put an image on my website by copy and pasting the image url which is pulled from the owners website eg: http://www.mysite.com/myimage.jpg I back link it to give the owner credibility. However I read about doing this method is stealing bandwidth because my website is pulling data from other sites. Can I download the images to my web server and back link them, or will I get in trouble for that? Which is the correct method to do? Thanks.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Image copyright law???
- Thread starter JavaWizKid
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
You'll probably get in trouble for it. You should really ask the owner of the content if it's OK to use their image on your web server with proper credit given.
Well, copyright laws differ depending on where you're at. Most countries don't seem to care too much and the legal hassles often make it not worth going after people. Google images post images from people's sites without permission, though you can setup a robots.txt file to block that. Linking directly to an image on a site can be stopped through hot-linking blocks. For instance, if you tried to link directly to an image on my site you'll end up showing an image that says you're a thief. Copying the image and pointing back is an alright approach, but you should at least have a way for the image owner to contact you and request removal of the image.
I don't know about the copyright aspect, but I do know that a lot of hosts frown on the type of image hotlinking you're describing. You're exactly right that you're using their bandwidth, and many times the (original) host will shut down the image link.
I can't speak for any other country, but with the regard to the UK (and most likely Europe).
If you link an image from another's website AND if they own the copyright to that image (this might not always be the case), they can serve you with a 'cease and desist' and ultimately force you to take down the image. If the actual owner of the image comes along, they can also serve you with a 'cease and desist'.
With respect to America, my knowledge of the DMCA is limited, but I think the principle is the same, they can issue you with a request to take down the image, which can again be enforced in a federal court if you refuse.
Also bare in mind some images on websites may be from royalty free image sites (like istockphoto), if you just take one of those from another site, and credit that site (when the actual owner is lets say, iStock), iStock could also come after you.
Utimatly though. Hotlinking (i.e. embedding images hosted by another without their permission) is a big no no in the internet world and you will find, as mentioned above, that many sites now user robots.txt to prevent this.
If you link an image from another's website AND if they own the copyright to that image (this might not always be the case), they can serve you with a 'cease and desist' and ultimately force you to take down the image. If the actual owner of the image comes along, they can also serve you with a 'cease and desist'.
With respect to America, my knowledge of the DMCA is limited, but I think the principle is the same, they can issue you with a request to take down the image, which can again be enforced in a federal court if you refuse.
Also bare in mind some images on websites may be from royalty free image sites (like istockphoto), if you just take one of those from another site, and credit that site (when the actual owner is lets say, iStock), iStock could also come after you.
Utimatly though. Hotlinking (i.e. embedding images hosted by another without their permission) is a big no no in the internet world and you will find, as mentioned above, that many sites now user robots.txt to prevent this.
Also if you are going to do this and you are going to take a lot of photos from other websites, make sure you have a dmca takedown request form. An example is the youtube one here:
http://www.youtube.com/copyright_complaint_form
http://www.youtube.com/copyright_complaint_form
My brother works for a law firm that specializes in copyright and trademarks. He explains it as the following. In order for copyright to apply on a website the content must be copyrighted through the US Copyright Office. Do you know that 99% of the content on the web as far as the USA is concerned remains un-copyrighted!!! Unless the picture is an original picture or a copyrighted logo then it's basically free game. The person has to be able to prove that it's their original work and most attorneys request in upwards of 2000 dollars just to file this sort of injunction. So I think your pretty much okay as who is going to file an injunction over a picture. As long as it's not pictures of a nude celebrity like the venessa hudgens nudity thing you will be fine. OH good luck serving a summons for court over state lines. Which means you have to go federal and that can cost in even more in fees for that. You'll be fine.