Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Widgetal

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Jun 11, 2009
25
0
Why the need for two, what's the difference and what's the benefit?

Thanks.
 
One's faster than the other but uses more power, so sucks more out of your battery.

The faster one also raises the temperature more dramatically, which can be a good thing on a frosty morning.
 
It only a benefit if you going to be doing alot of heavy graphic works , like gaming , photo editing , if all you do is use the internet and itunes and macbook pro will do it just fine
 
The 9400M is sufficient 95% of the time, and draws a minimal amount of power as an integrated graphics solution.

The 9600M GT provides extra power when needed but has the drawback of drawing extra power when in-use, lowering battery life and increasing heat output.
 
In layman's terms?

The 9600 is faster but it consumes more power so it isn't great if you're using the battery.

The 9400 is slower but is battery friendly.
 
Nope read it again, it does talk about on the fly switching but it mentions running both cards at the same time working together.
Well I suppose it may be possible through a driver update, but it doesn't look like it's even enabled under Windows, so I doubt it will happen at all.

Clicking here takes you to a page on Nvidia's website listing compatible chipsets with GeForce Boost. Note that the 9600M GT unfortunately does not have a check mark next to it.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.