I understand your frustration but keep in mind that similarly priced android tablets have a lower screen resolution than the ipad 1. I believe right now, the xoom is the exception.
Cost.
They really wanted to hit that $499 price point.
It's a technical limitation I would imagine. The screens are just too expensive for them to make it in volume. Expect them next year/generation. To be honest while screen resolution is a big deal to me, it being thinner, lighter, and faster (not necessarily in that order) was most important to me.
I know most people think the first iPad is pretty fast, but I have always found that certain things, especially web browsing, did not compare to using a real computer in terms of speed. Plus I always felt the GPU was pretty behind in terms of gaming, and now it should be pretty awesome.
Plus it is definitely gonna have more RAM, so Safari won't have to reload as much when switching tabs.
So no change??? Same resolution? This is to me the dissappointing part....
Is that a marketing strategy like the iPhone they did not upgrade the resolution till iP4 or is it tech limtation? Maybe but I am sure they could have done a bit better in terms of resolution...
You're all wrong....For marketing purposes, next iPad will have a better res screen....don't you guys get apple by now? lol...they need something else to entice you to buy the next version
Upping the resolution would cause issues with existing apps, developers would have to rescale gfx for all existing applications - you could double the resolution iPhone 4 style (i.e Retina) but there are so many reasons why this would be difficult.
This post sums it up quite well;
http://blog.nelso.com/2011/01/problem-with-retina-display-on-ipad-2.html
I think that resolution is going to be a sticking point on the ipad for a while...
C.
That post on that site is actually off the mark.
> But almost no content (forget about
> video for a second) is currently created
> with a 3 megapixel, 260 dpi display in mind
That is fundamentally untrue. Other than video, ALL content is made for that display. We just think of it as "print" content. Books, magazines, business correspondence, photographic prints, and anything that comes out of a printer match that resolution. Even a lowly business letter has more and smaller dots on it than an iPad with Retina Display. Safari/WebKit will happily render the Web at that resolution.
When a screen gets up into 300 dpi territory, you stop treating it like a screen device (authoring in pixels) and start treating it like a print device (authoring in inches). iOS devices encourage this because they have fixed screen sizes in inches, so they are akin to a paper size:
"Letter" 8.5x11 300 dpi
"Tabloid" 11x17 300 dpi
"iPhone" 2x3 160/320 dpi
"iPad" 6x8 130/260 dpi
The truth is, if we were to conceptualize an electronic device to replace print, we would start with a 300 dpi display as the fundamental feature, because that is a fundamental "magic number" in print. Most artwork is made at that resolution, the resolution ruler is marked at multiples of 300, and it fools a 20/20 eye at typical reading distance into not being able to see the dots. The lower-resolution displays in iPhone original/3G/3GS and iPad 3G (and any future iPads with low-res display) are hacks
stepping stones to the Retina Displays that the devices are "supposed" to have to fulfill their function as paper replacements. It's a very elegant compromise because it is short-term and there is almost no pain to transition from the low-res to high-res screen, either for users or developers. The high-res screen emulates the low-res screen (4 pixels in place of 1) from day one and then apps gradually take advantage of the enhanced sharpness that has been made available to them. Soon, the low-res devices are retired as part of the regular product life cycle.
So an iPad with Retina Display is REQUIRED by book, magazine, and other "print" content. It's required for photography, where people are commonly making 12 megapixel or 18 megapixel images that have way more dots than an iPad with Retina Display. And even for video, always the lowest-res content, HD is now old hat. The next size up is "4K" (4000 pixels horizontally), and it is commonly made now, and is even supported by YouTube already. That has to be downscaled for iPad with Retina Display.
The only question on this is what year it will arrive. Can they get it done in the 2011 iPad, or 2012? Whenever it arrives, the content will exploit it immediately.