iPad Pro

[jsbaugh]

Not sure if this a repost.

 

[MacDawg]

Not sure why it would be posted once, much less twice

Woof, Woof - Dawg

 

[spinnerlys]

A similar topic: https://forums.macrumors.com/archive/index.php/t-855959.html

But have you read the specs?

1600x1200 on a 9.7" display?
1.8kg for a handheld device?
3.06GHz for a handheld device (heat)?

Some fanboy had not enough wet dreams I guess (I mean the creator, not specifically you, unless you are the creator of this wet dream).

 

[calderone]

One of the most unrealistic things I have seen. This would be an engineering marvel.

 

[Chaos123x]

Not sure if this a repost.

Sounds pretty good but you left out a pressure senistive wacom sensors.

Plus the OS is not custom for a touch screen.

The price should be more like $1500 to $2000

 

[jsbaugh]

Yea I know its a joke but thought it was funny.

 

[ARF900]

LOL that thing would be revolutionary for about 15 minutes before it caught on fire.

 

[marksman]

1600x1200 on that screen size would be awful.

 

[calderone]

Sounds pretty good but you left out a pressure senistive wacom sensors.

Plus the OS is not custom for a touch screen.

The price should be more like $1500 to $2000

This would run $3000+ easy.

 

[bpd115]

That device is not possible with today's technology.

Can't believe someone wasted their time on that.

 

[Chaos123x]

This would run $3000+ easy.

Well you can buy one right now for $1649

http://www.axiotron.com/index.php?id=modbook

 

[calderone]

Well you can buy one right now for $1649

http://www.axiotron.com/index.php?id=modbook

1. Apple tax
2. The engineering required to make that happen right now is going to cost some money.

 

[admanimal]

Well you can buy one right now for $1649

http://www.axiotron.com/index.php?id=modbook

Wow that is almost exactly like the hypothetical iPad Pro except for all of the ways that it is wildly different.

 

[Chaos123x]

Wow that is almost exactly like the hypothetical iPad Pro except for all of the ways that it is wildly different.

Well it's allot closer than a iPad.

 

[lordhamster]

It could be exactly to that spec at $700 bucks and you'd still have douchebags complaining here.

 

[calderone]

It could be exactly to that spec at $700 bucks and you'd still have douchebags complaining here.

True story.

 

[NeuralControl]

I can only imagine how hot that device would get. There would be no cooling at all. However, the specs list is incredible.

 

[leomac08]

$4,999!!!!!!!! heart attack

i would rather put that in a down payment for a 2010 BMW 335i or a small house.

 

[King Mook Mook]

LOL! I wish, but there is no way that is technically possible today, maybe five years time.

 

[marksman]

I like that it weighs 250% more has 30% less battery life and costs 800% more.

Definitely sounds like a winner to me!

 

[mtnDewFTW]

I know this will never happen, but JUST SAYING, if it did, it would be such a pain to use those small buttons on OS X

 

[bobsentell]

OSX on an iPad would require a stylus. Jobs would have a heart attack.

But the specs are possible in about three years. Just not with all the ports.

 

[sushi]

Ridiculous!

Having an iPad physically connected to many peripherals defeats the purpose of the iPad.

Can you imagine 30 foot cables so that you could walk around the room. Ha ha!

 

[Ljohnson72]

512GB SSD? Blu-ray? HDTV tuner? 3.06ghz C2D? 8GB RAM? This would one engineering feat. All the ports are stupid though IMO and Apple will never adopt Blu-Ray.

 

[bobsentell]

....and Apple will never adopt Blu-Ray.

Which is funny since they were one of the companies that were pushing it during the format war.