Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Homme

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Jun 17, 2014
1,104
998
Sydney
With Apple only releasing the 16 plus at 256GB for the same price as a 256GB iPhone 17, why would anyone want to pick the 16 plus ( especially since the 17’s screen size is now 6.3) even the iPhone 16 at 128GB Only (lol) despite a 100 cheaper price it’s obviously a no brainer that the 17 is a much better price

Then there’s the 16e which is still selling at its 3 Capacity’s since it came out (double lol). It’s good that Apple still is keeping the same capacity’s for the 16e too bad about the 16 and 16 plus especially since the non pro 17 destroys the previous competition ( the 16e is in its corner when the 17e comes out)
 
With Apple only releasing the 16 plus at 256GB for the same price as a 256GB iPhone 17, why would anyone want to pick the 16 plus ( especially since the 17’s screen size is now 6.3) even the iPhone 16 at 128GB Only (lol) despite a 100 cheaper price it’s obviously a no brainer that the 17 is a much better price

Then there’s the 16e which is still selling at its 3 Capacity’s since it came out (double lol). It’s good that Apple still is keeping the same capacity’s for the 16e too bad about the 16 and 16 plus especially since the non pro 17 destroys the previous competition ( the 16e is in its corner when the 17e comes out)

last years models for $100 less usually doesn't make much sense of current offerings.

sometimes people think they're getting a steal getting a pro for $100 less especially if the successor goes up in base price. otherwise I think its for people who dont know any better.

I say this as someone who has and likes their iPhone 16 plus 256gb but I also bought it at launch last year not a day ago or today.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Homme
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.