Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
69,326
40,332


The first set of reviews are out for the new 6.3-inch base iPhone 17 model ahead of the full iPhone 17 lineup launching on Friday.

iphone-17-models.jpg

As noted in our buyer's guide, the iPhone 17 features Apple's biggest display upgrade to a non-Pro model in years, with a larger 6.3-inch display (up from 6.1 inches) and a 120Hz ProMotion display for refresh rates up to 120Hz. There are also some major camera improvements, faster performance, and big battery life gains. So what do these enhancements mean for users in real terms?

According to The Verge's Jacob Kastrenakes, the new display is a game changer:
In size, resolution, and specs, the iPhone 17's display is the same as what you’ll find on this year's Pro. And the most notable thing about the change is that the iPhone 17 finally has an always-on display. The feature works exactly the same as it does on the Pro phones, too. When you set the iPhone 17 down, the screen dims, showing a faint version of your wallpaper, widgets, clock, and notifications.

Being able to quickly glance at your phone for information is extremely handy and instantly makes the device a whole lot more useful.
TechRadar's Jacob Krol also had only positive things to say about the new 6.3-inch Super Retina XDR display, calling it "the star of the show."
Yes, the iPhone 17's 6.3-inch Super Retina XDR OLED display now supports ProMotion, meaning it delivers a buttery-smooth experience for scrolling, swiping, gaming, streaming, and even general navigation, as it will adjust on the fly from 1Hz all the way up to 120Hz depending on what you're doing. The iPhone 16, 15, and 14 before it were all locked at 60Hz, which wasn't a big deal if you weren’t coming from a 120Hz device, but this is a really nice upgrade.

The iPhone 17's display story is really about the sum of its parts. ProMotion, Always-On, and a slightly larger screen make for a great experience, and there's a serious amount of value to be found through this display alone. Oh, and it's also coated in Ceramic Shield 2, which makes it three times as scratch-resistant as the screen on the iPhone 16 – that's a win, especially if you're prone to dropping your iPhone.
The iPhone 17 features two rear cameras consisting of a 48-megapixel Wide camera and a 48-megapixel Ultra Wide – an upgrade over the 12-megapixel Ultra Wide lens on the iPhone 16.

CNET's Abrar Al-Heeti particularly welcomed the camera upgrades and noted how the new features allow the iPhone 17 to punch above the iPhone Air:
It's interesting to have more photo-taking flexibility on a less expensive iPhone model, since the iPhone Air can't take 0.5x photos or Cinematic mode videos. It's another way this baseline device makes a case for itself. Like the iPhone Air, the iPhone 17 takes 12-megapixel 2x telephoto images, which maintain a solid level of detail as you punch in. Photos default to 24 megapixels, but you can switch to 48 megapixels to capture a bit more detail.
The iPhone 17 features 8GB of RAM – the least of all new iPhones – and Apple's base A19 processor, including a six-core CPU, a five-core GPU, and Apple's Neural Engine. The GPU cores also each have their own Neural Accelerator, which Apple says boosts the chip's ability to process AI calculations.

PC Mag's Eric Zeman put the phone through its paces and came away impressed:
I ran the phone through the typical battery of benchmark tests to see how it fares against the competition. Surprisingly, it runs a bit faster than the iPhone Air, which becomes much hotter than the 17 under load. Meanwhile, the Pro iPhones are about 10% faster, which isn't as big a difference as I expected.

The iPhone 17 buries the Pixel 10's Tensor G5 processor in testing, though Google tells us it designs its chips to run AI calculations, not perform well on benchmarks. The iPhone 17's A19 also bested the Galaxy S25's Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy chip in CPU performance, though it fell behind in GPU calculations.

Ultimately, the iPhone 17 and its combination of memory and A19 power are more than enough to handle all your apps, daily tasks, and Apple Intelligence requests. In my tests, the phone had no trouble generating AI images, conjuring up new Genmoji, and powering Apple Photos' editing tools.
Apple claims that the iPhone 17 offers an additional 8 hours of video playback compared to the iPhone 16. But how does that translate to real world gains? Tom's Guide's John Velasco reported a subtle improvement in his tests:
Our battery drain test reveals an improvement, albeit a small one. It reaches a time of 12 hours and 47 minutes, an improvement of 34 minutes over the iPhone 16. That might not sound like a whole lot, but it's worth remembering that the iPhone 17 has a larger 6.3-inch display this time.

I can affirm that I'm getting all-day battery life with a full charge. Roughly speaking, I'm seeing 15% battery life right before bed time. Most of my time was spent on checking emails, watching a few videos on my break at work, and looking through all of my social feeds. It's undoubtedly nowhere as close to offering the endurance I’ve been having with my iPhone 16 Pro Max for just about the last year, but most people will suffice getting through a work day.

I'm excited to report that Apple also upgrades the iPhone 17's charging speeds, with its 35W wired charging getting its battery to 39% in 15 minutes — and then to 71% in 30 minutes. That's a marked improvement over the iPhone 16, but Apple didn't stop there as it also adds 25W Qi 2.2 charging support.
Like the iPhone Air and iPhone 17 Pro models, the base iPhone 17 can be pre-ordered now, starting at $799.

Videos


... Click here to read rest of article

Article Link: iPhone 17 Reviews: Choosing the Base Model 'No Longer Means Missing Out'
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: adrianlondon
If I can turn off PWM on the standard iPhone 17, not just the Pro models, I’ll switch from my iPhone 11 to the standard iPhone 17. Otherwise, I need the 17 Pro.
 
Last edited:
I hope that now the masses with the standard iPhone 17 will have the always-on-display, that Apple will finally give better customization...

I would like to have the AOD to have a different 'lockscreen' than my standard (bigger clock, widgets more prominent).
 
I get the Pro model for the telephoto lens, not the ProMotion display.

I don’t get the big deal of 120Hz; it’s mostly (or maybe only) used for making scrolling smoother. It would be a little more interesting if it could be used to watch 120 fps videos or play games at 120 fps, but I think 60 fps is fine.
 
If I wind up getting a phone this year it will be this one. I generally prefer the larger Pro Max phones, but for the price the base iPhone 17 is hard to beat this year. Plus I really dislike the color options of the Pro.
 
Unless I'm mistaken, Apple stops supporting older models when they no longer have enough RAM to keep up with the latest OS updates.

If this iPhone has less RAM than the others, I'd guess it's going to receive at least 1 and more likely at least 3 fewer years of support.

These days I just want devices that last. Wasn't that the reason we used to buy Apple products? So if I'm going to buy, I'm looking for whatever will get supported for 7+ years.
 
Unless I'm mistaken, Apple stops supporting older models when they no longer have enough RAM to keep up with the latest OS updates.

If this iPhone has less RAM than the others, I'd guess it's going to receive at least 1 and more likely at least 3 fewer years of support.

These days I just want devices that last. Wasn't that the reason we used to buy Apple products? So if I'm going to buy, I'm looking for whatever will get supported for 7+ years.
Unlikely as the iPhone 16 lineup had 8GB of RAM and it doesn’t seem AI won’t work on-device but just limited or less responsive or maybe fewer processes in-memory. Elevated queries probably will still be done via cloud computing. These phone will probably last another 6 years and will be telling what Apple does next year.
 
First time I have gone "non Pro" since the first Pro. Swapping the 15 Pro for the 17 base.

Through my weird college alumni carrier, I get a 50% off MSRP iPhone every 18 months. So if I really miss the zoom lens, I'll know it by then.
 
Unless I'm mistaken, Apple stops supporting older models when they no longer have enough RAM to keep up with the latest OS updates.

If this iPhone has less RAM than the others, I'd guess it's going to receive at least 1 and more likely at least 3 fewer years of support.

These days I just want devices that last. Wasn't that the reason we used to buy Apple products? So if I'm going to buy, I'm looking for whatever will get supported for 7+ years.
My iPhone XS (2018) is unsupported and has the same amount of RAM as the iPhone 13 (2021).

Apple discontinues support for various reasons, you cannot reliably point to a single aspect that will lead to discontinuation in 5-7 years. You can maximise support by buying devices within one year of their release that have the newest A series chips. I think then you could expect 7 years.

Consider also: if you are planning to keep the device for 7 years or more, you likely have to replace the batteries, maybe even more than once. This is not an insignificant cost.
 
iJustine is less a tech reviewer and more a full-time Apple cheerleader cosplaying as a YouTuber. Every review is just a paid-in-exposure commercial where she squeals over cardboard like it’s the second coming. If Apple released an iBrick, she’d call it revolutionary while holding it up like the Ten Commandments.
Especially for her, ibildo /change b
 
  • Like
Reactions: rhinosrcool
The iPhone 17 seems almost too good to be true. I was looking for some gotchas on the spec sheets, but I haven't come across any so far. I was considering getting the iPhone 16 Pro for a lower price, but I can actually get the iPhone 17 for about 80 euros less than a discounted iPhone 16 Pro 128 GB model. The iPhone 16 Pro might look nicer, but in 7 years of using my iPhone XS, I have never used it without a (leather) case, so whether it is made from titanium, aluminium or glass does not matter to me at all. I think the iPhone 17 is the more sensible purchase with the same display, newer chips and cameras and double the base storage – unless you really need things that only the Pro models have (which I don't think I do).
 
There is always one thing missing from the 17 line that convinces me to go with the Pro. This year, it would be telephoto lens. But I think these phones all look better than the pro line. Sage, black or white would be my choice.
 
Unless I'm mistaken, Apple stops supporting older models when they no longer have enough RAM to keep up with the latest OS updates.

If this iPhone has less RAM than the others, I'd guess it's going to receive at least 1 and more likely at least 3 fewer years of support.

These days I just want devices that last. Wasn't that the reason we used to buy Apple products? So if I'm going to buy, I'm looking for whatever will get supported for 7+ years.
Ordinarily I would agree with that. I have the iPhone 14 Pro and honestly the big difference that I can see besides RAM are the photo and video capabilities for enthusiasts. I don't fall in that category. I have had this phone for three years and could certainly keep it longer but you know how it is. I have an iPhone 17 base model in black on order. You are certainly correct if you keep your phones for many years.
 
Wait wait wait what? The 17 has hold up only 34 mins longer than the 16???? wtf? Where gets Apple the mentioned 8 hours longer battery life from? Yeah I know its not real life use numbers, but this still sucks if thats really true.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SantaFeNM
Hyperbole article title. Choosing any phone means you are "missing out" on something. Otherwise there would only be one model and we would call it the People's Phone.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.