Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
67,938
38,643


All four iPhone 17 models will adopt metalens technology for Face ID, according to Jeff Pu, an Apple analyst at equity research firm GF Securities. He revealed this information in an investor research note earlier this month.

iPhone-14-Pro-Dynamic-Island.jpg

Earlier this year, a leaker known as Digital Chat Station also claimed that the iPhone 17 Pro Max would adopt a metalens for Face ID that integrates the transmitter and receiver components. They said that this change would reduce the size of some of the Face ID components, resulting in a smaller Dynamic Island on the device.

Last year, Pu also said that the iPhone 17 Pro Max would have a much narrower Dynamic Island, as a result of the metalens. However, he now believes that all of the iPhone 17 models will adopt a metalens, meaning that the change would extend to the base model iPhone 17, the ultra-thin iPhone 17 Air, and the smaller iPhone 17 Pro.

In January, however, Apple analyst Ming-Chi Kuo said that he expects the Dynamic Island‌'s size to remain "largely unchanged" across the ‌iPhone 17‌ series.

All three sources have proven track records of sharing details about future Apple products, so it remains to be seen if the Dynamic Island will change in size.

In any case, next year's iPhone 18 Pro models are rumored to feature under-screen Face ID with only a small front camera hole.

Article Link: iPhone 17 With a Smaller Dynamic Island? Here's What Rumors Say
 
The dot projector used for FaceID is currently prism-based and takes up almost the entire thickness of an iPhone or iPad. This is the reason why FaceID is not currently doable in a MacBook's even thinner screen chassis. Switching to a metalens for the dot projector could potentially collapse the amount of space needed and allow Apple to finally offer FaceID on its laptops.
 
The Pro models should get it definitely and so should the new Air/slim iPhone. Possible for a reduction in size of the dynamic island to happen for all the models as I don't think the base model will be the only one not getting it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mganu
The dot projector used for FaceID is currently prism-based and takes up almost the entire thickness of an iPhone or iPad. This is the reason why FaceID is not currently doable in a MacBook's even thinner screen chassis. Switching to a metalens for the dot projector could potentially collapse the amount of space needed and allow Apple to finally offer FaceID on its laptops.
Or Apple could stop pretending everyone wants giant razor blade as a laptop and thicken it up a bit. lol.
 
Dynamic Notchland is an attempt by that master of mediocrity, Tim Cook, to convince people that notches are necessary.

Newsflash: If there were bigger bezels to house all the things in the notch, and thus there was no more notch, it would still be possible to have the exact same black-background graphics and features of Dynamic Notchland.
 
Wish they would add an option to make it read only. I am always accidentally selecting whatever Apple activates it and I don’t see any need to select it.
 
Wooo, it's time to get stoked for the ALL NEW iPhone '26! This is the best, most powerful iPhone Apple has ever released. And, Apple is proud to announce a leap forward, with the smallest Dynamic Island ever released in an iPhone. The best-in-class Dynamic Island now takes up 33% less space, allowing for more incredible content on your screen. Apple can't wait to see the incredible things customers are able to do with the ALL NEW iPhone '26. Apple thinks you're gonna love it.
 
You mean like making the notch smaller on the 13 Pro only to introduce the Dynamic Island the following year with the 14 Pro?

I get what you are saying. I guess I should have said "It would make no sense to mess with the Dynamic Island if you are just going to scrap it in another year."

But Apple still uses the notch on the lower level entry iPhone's like the 16e. They haven't entirely abandoned the concept of the notch. I just don't understand the concept or the level of thinking that Apple would waste money making significant changes to a feature that they are going to scrap entirely in less than a year.

I mean I guess anything is possible but it makes little to no sense to me.
 
The dot projector used for FaceID is currently prism-based and takes up almost the entire thickness of an iPhone or iPad. This is the reason why FaceID is not currently doable in a MacBook's even thinner screen chassis. Switching to a metalens for the dot projector could potentially collapse the amount of space needed and allow Apple to finally offer FaceID on its laptops.
That would be nice when I'm docked on my desktop. I keep the MacBook open as an added display along side my large display. When I need to authorize something I either have to awkwardly reach from my desktop keyboard to the laptop (on a stand) or enter the password. With FaceID I could just turn my head slightly and be done.
 
I'm amused at the number of complaints by iPhone users about a feature that Android is only now implementing in maybe a better than half-baked manner. This idea of the bezel-less, notch-less, 100% screen-to-body ratio phone that includes FaceID is more illusion than reality at this point.

Regardless, a lot of users including me use Dynamic Island daily, frequently. It's quite useful. If Apple is going to phase it out, it better come with a better mousetrap.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.