Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
67,713
38,219


Apple's iPhone 18 models will adopt TSMC's 2nm manufacturing process for the next-generation A20 chip, which will bring substantial performance and power efficiency improvements to next year's iPhones, but it may also incur significantly more costs that Apple could pass onto the customer.

a20-chip-feature.jpg

The latest corroboration that Apple will use TSMC's 2nm process in next year's iPhone models comes from Weibo-based leaker Digital Chat Station, who has sources in the Chinese supply chain. Industry analysts Ming-Chi Kuo and Jeff Pu have previously claimed as much, so it seems all but confirmed that Apple will adopt the more advanced silicon wafer technology.

In 2023, Apple adopted 3nm chips for its iPhones and Macs, an upgrade over the prior 5nm mode. The switch to 3nm technology brought 20 percent faster GPU speeds, 10 percent faster CPU speed, and a 2x faster Neural Engine to the iPhone, and similar improvements on Macs. The upcoming iPhone 17 series is expected to feature processors made using TSMC's N3P chip technology – an enhanced version of the 3nm process – but 2nm adoption in the iPhone 18 is expected to bring significantly more performance and efficiency gains.

The terms "3nm" and "2nm" describe generations of chip manufacturing technology, each with its own set of design rules and architecture. As these numbers decrease, they generally indicate smaller transistor sizes. Smaller transistors allow more to be packed onto a single chip, typically resulting in increased processing speed and improved power efficiency.

TSMC plans to start manufacturing 2nm chips in late 2025, and Apple is expected to be the first company to receive chips built on the new process. TSMC is building two new facilities to accommodate 2nm chip production, and working on approval for a third. TSMC generally builds new fabs when it needs to increase production capacity to handle significant orders for chips, and TSMC is expanding in a major way for 2nm technology.

However, with Apple expected to be the first major beneficiary of the new process, it is also likely to face significantly increased costs, which could see the iPhone 18 face another round of price hikes on top of possible price increases on this year's iPhone 17 models due to U.S. import tariffs. Apple scored a reprieve from the 145 percent tariff impacting goods imported from China and the 10 percent tariff on goods imported from other countries, but it doesn't sound like that's going to last.

U.S. President Donald Trump is currently working on new semiconductor levies that will likely impact all Apple devices. Trump earlier this week said that no one is "getting off the hook" and there "was no tariff exception." Apple and other tech companies are "just moving to a different tariff bucket," with the 20 percent "Fentanyl Tariffs" still in place, and additional tariffs coming.

Article Link: iPhone 18's Costly 2nm Process Adoption Could Lead to Price Hikes
 
Last edited:
I am actually surprised Apple hasn’t really done this already.

A Cheese Burger at McDonalds went from 1€ to 1,20€ and finally 2,69€ in the last 10 years. I remember getting a Mc Menu with an extra Burger with a coupon for 5,49€ when I was a student, so around 2014. Now it’s 11,99€ and they removed the drink on many coupons!
Consider it their gift to world health. Half of the price hike was due to inflation the other half was part of their “premium” rebranding and ensuing loss of mid to lower income customers at the same time. They further increased margins to try to save profits. McD’s price increase of the past ten years is way above industry norm and more than just inflationary reasons, rather corporate strategy.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: CatalinApple
More people will realize that these devices can last longer, especially if you’re in the habit of yearly upgrades. Great for Apple’s sustainability goals! ;)

If Apple’s sustainability goals are truly genuine, they should also commit to providing security updates for a longer period—especially for devices that are still fully functional.

That would be a real step toward extending their lifespan and reducing waste.
 
Consider it their gift to world health. Half of the price hike was due to inflation the other half was part of their “premium” rebranding and ensuing loss of mid to lower income customers at the same time. They further increased margins to try to save profits. McD’s price increase of the past ten years is way above industry norm and more than just inflationary reasons, rather corporate strategy.
In the UK it has become cheaper in many cases to get a burger at a pub with a pint of beer than to go to McDonald’s!
 
I am actually surprised Apple hasn’t really done this already.

A Cheese Burger at McDonalds went from 1€ to 1,20€ and finally 2,69€ in the last 10 years. I remember getting a Mc Menu with an extra Burger with a coupon for 5,49€ when I was a student, so around 2014. Now it’s 11,99€ and they removed the drink on many coupons!

Consider that the iMac was introduced in 1998 at a base price of $1299, while today’s infinitely more powerful iMac M4 starts at … $1299.

Rapid advances in technology over the past 30 years have allowed prices to remain largely the same for tech products for an incredibly long time.

Said another way, when you account for inflation and the real value of money, electronics have become significantly cheaper over time while most consumer products have stayed at roughly the same value (the dollar value of which goes steadily up over time due to inflation).
 
Last edited:
I doubt that Apple would raise their prices due to newer chips. Despite the perpetual rumors, they've never done it before, so I doubt they'll do it now. I find it far more likely that prices would broadly increase due to trade disruptions, including but not limited to raw material import/export restrictions ("rare earths"), tariffs, political upheaval over Taiwan / warmongering, uncontrolled currency inflation, etc.
 
Consider that the iMac was introduced in 1998 at a base price of $1299, while today’s infinitely more powerful iMac M4 starts at … $1299.

Rapid advances in technology over the past 30 years have allowed prices to remain largely the same for tech products for an incredibly long time.
I would argue a larger reason for prices staying level beyond technology advances is the fact that the electronics supply chain has largely moved to Asia during the early 2000's, and China specifically. The original iMac from 1998 was manufactured in California and Ireland and moved to China with the G5 generation around 2004. Factories in the US would struggle to match the scale of what companies like Foxconn can do, especially since most US workers wouldn't tolerate the working conditions involved.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.