Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

mintlivedotcom

macrumors regular
Original poster
Apr 21, 2004
194
0
I have search here and the 'net (including Apple's page) to find out if the Nano can be connected to a TV to view the photos. Otherwise, what's the point of viewing them so tiny on the Nano?
 
Maybe third parties can make camera adaptors?

I dunno. Maybe they just felt like adding it since they already switched to a color screen. If they didn't we'd be hearing endless complaint about why Apple just didn't add photo support. :rolleyes:
 
mintlivedotcom said:
I have search here and the 'net (including Apple's page) to find out if the Nano can be connected to a TV to view the photos. Otherwise, what's the point of viewing them so tiny on the Nano?
So people can see them? Even a small picture is still worth a thousand words.
 
Well, does the Nano Pod fit in the Photo Pod dock? Didnt that thing have Video Output?
 
Good questions! I want to be able to show the Grannies the latest slideshows of my newborn through their TV and I'm sure they can't focus on a tiny Nano screen.
 
mintlivedotcom said:
Good questions! I want to be able to show the Grannies the latest slideshows of my newborn through their TV and I'm sure they can't focus on a tiny Nano screen.
You can always whine your way into an Apple Store to pick up a 20GB iPod.
 
Lacero said:
You can always whine your way into an Apple Store to pick up a 20GB iPod.

Better yet get the Epson P-2000. Great screen on that. I would be camping at Apples door for an iPod maxi that gave iTunes capabilities to the likes of the p-2000.
 
Lacero said:
You can always whine your way into an Apple Store to pick up a 20GB iPod.

What do you mean "whine"? I am not complaining, just asking questions about something I don't even own.
 
The most likely reason the nano doesn't contain video out, or audio in, or any other features that the bigger iPods have is simply size. The 20GB and 60GB iPods are quite large in comparison, because they have all those extra "chips" in them allowing tv out, and audio in. These are hardware features that can't simply be added with software. I believe the first iPod photo was thicker then the original 4G BW iPod simply because it allowed TV out. So, I doubt the nano will ever get TV out, unless technology drastically changes soon.
 
kainjow said:
The most likely reason the nano doesn't contain video out, or audio in, or any other features that the bigger iPods have is simply size. The 20GB and 60GB iPods are quite large in comparison, because they have all those extra "chips" in them allowing tv out, and audio in. These are hardware features that can't simply be added with software. I believe the first iPod photo was thicker then the original 4G BW iPod simply because it allowed TV out. So, I doubt the nano will ever get TV out, unless technology drastically changes soon.

Thanks! That is the most helpful response I have read so far. I agree, it must be the limitations of the small size. I guess I will stop drooling over the Nano and take another look at the iPod Photo.
 
They must have assumed that since the nano can display photos, it can output them. Those are 2 completely different things.

Apple's iPod nano specs page has different descriptions of "Connectivity" for the nano and photo. For the nano it says "Dock connector, stereo minijack" and for the photo it says "Dock connector, remote connector, stereo minijack, composite video and audio through minijack".

Displaying photos on screen is simply a software feature (reading files from the hard drive, converting them to LCD pixels) but outputting images to a TV is a hardware feature. You need a microcontroller that can read in image data and then output that as a TV signal.
 
Apple might release an iPod nano Dock that has TV capability. They might be working on it right now, considering the nano was rushed out to make it in time for the Sept 7 event. Expected price should be $59.
 
kainjow said:
They must have assumed that since the nano can display photos, it can output them. Those are 2 completely different things.

Apple's iPod nano specs page has different descriptions of "Connectivity" for the nano and photo. For the nano it says "Dock connector, stereo minijack" and for the photo it says "Dock connector, remote connector, stereo minijack, composite video and audio through minijack".

Displaying photos on screen is simply a software feature (reading files from the hard drive, converting them to LCD pixels) but outputting images to a TV is a hardware feature. You need a microcontroller that can read in image data and then output that as a TV signal.

i guess the nano's dock doesnt support it but the ipod photo dock does...
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.