I am saying just putting on a wristband insures nothing without testing and a proper connection in place (had to repair and install these stations so have direct experience). If you were the ESD guru you claim, you would know this.
I never claimed to be an ESD guru. Quote? Link? Evidence? Yeah... I claimed to be a witness to seeing an increase in chip failure rates in a testing environment that monitored the operating capabilities of encased microchips. A properly working ESD wristband will help safeguard the operator from frying the chip through electrostatic discharge. It's not a guarantee and I have seen it, myself, in a testing environment with reports on thousands of individual chip operations, that failure to properly utilize an ESD wristband, despite utilizing ESD mats and coats, definitely contributed to the failure rate of these chips. My experience is not with the equipment used to fabricate microchips, it's with the chips themselves. Get it through your stubborn brain, my advice is not faulty, yours is!
Your advice... You still have not explained why your advice is not to wear one, because it could be improperly used. Instead you offer that the OP should "practice good caution" without actually offering anything specific about what good caution is!!! What does that mean? Don't jam a screwdriver into the memory chip when taking it out of the packaging? How about wash your hands before handling to reduce oil transference? Is that part of good caution? Instead of giving the OP something useful, you jizzed all over my post and claimed you took the high ground.
I am just stating that having a wristband in use insures nothing, and I have a problem with your claims about the growth of problems resulting from ESD discharge (as in all of my years in the industry, I saw no reports detailing this condition that you swear exists.)
I've watched the training videos. I've looked at the failure reason codes on the reports. ESD damage can flat out fry a circuit or cause minor damage that may allow it's intended operation until it is under stress. Then under stress or stress testing, whatever term helps you understand my point, like a glass window, the damage finally goes from end to end, resulting in a complete failure of the circuit.
I could stoop to your level and insult you as I don't fully agree with your post, but I won't. I will take the higher ground. I see that you have a problem with my post, but I have said nothing that isn't well known throughout the ESD environment.
If you took the higher ground, you'd spend less time arguing with me and more time giving some useful advice to the OP. Instead your advice sounds exactly like that you shouldn't bother wearing a seatbelt, just practice good caution when driving, because if you don't wear a seatbelt properly, it wont save your life in an accident.
A Quality ESD Wristband = $7.95
8GB Memory Module Upgrade = $91.99
The fallacy in your advice = PRICELESS
I found this little
gem of a post, after posting all of the above.
Wow, how did you cram so much misinformation in one post? I do not believe your claims for one second. If you have static damage it will appear immediately, not 2-3 years down the road (it may gradually get worse over time, but it will manifest itself in some form immediately after the static damage occurs).
Am I reading that right? "...it may gradually get worse over time..." Those are your words, aren't they?