Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

humuslokiy

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Nov 9, 2010
13
0
Hong Kong, China
For 17" mbp model....
Is CPU upgrade 2.2-> 2.3 worthy? (250USD/1950HKD)

family.png


i7 2720QM -> i7 2820QM
cache: 2MB More
CPU: 0.1 GHz More per core

thx for your time for reading this post >v<!!:):):):)
 
The major thing you are getting with the 2.3GHz processor is not the additional 100MHz of clock speed, but the additional 2MB of cache (8MB vs. 6MB), which will offer better performance in certain tasks. This was the main difference in the i5 and the i7, the cache offerings. The top-spec 2.3GHz offering will give you the maximum 8MB of processor cache which might give you an advantage when doing something very intensive such as compressing video or motion 3D animation rendering.
 
Installing a 128gb ssd in it instead and investing in an external hard drive would be the smarter move. Especially considering that they now use thunderbolt, you'll eventually see some externals that use it.
 
You will probably never notice the extra 2Mb of cache, and the 2.3 is only 4% faster than the 2.2

So your videos will render 4% faster, or maybe a bit more if the cache increase helps at all, call it 5%. If you have an hour render, is it worth it to save 3 minutes? Probably not. I would save the money for stuff you will need, like bigger or faster disks (maybe a nice LightPeak enclosure for them) or a SSD or more RAM.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.