Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

JoshGlzBrk

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Aug 27, 2009
760
15
So I bought my 15" i7 macbook pro in April and I love it. But the only thing I didn't upgrade was ram because I knew that it can be acquired at a much more reasonable price. But I just have a question.

I found this 2x4GB crucial ram clocked at 1066 and clocked at 1333 for the same price on new egg.

1066: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820148276
1333: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820148345

I also found the 1333 for only $180 through google shopping.

Is it wise to get ram clocked faster than the laptop can handle due to the fact that it could be used in a later laptop that does support that clock speed?

Also $180: http://bit.ly/dqYmSb
 
I was under the impression crucial is the best brand because they pretty much supply like 30% of the whole market with memory chips.
 
So you think windows is better because it runs on 95% of all computers?

Did I say that? No I didn't.

And that analogy doesn't even fit with what I originally said anyways. As other companies don't rebrand windows 7 as their own operating system.

But companies rebrand OEM memory chips as their own...
 
i bought 8gb of g.skill for $160ish off newegg, works great. zero problems. it's been in my mbp for about a month.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/532.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0.5 Mobile/8B117 Safari/6531.22.7)

Not necessarily. The iMac comes with 1066 ram and it runs 1333 without downclocking it. I am sure it's likely it'll run at 1333
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.