I'm a high school student with 2 years to go until college, I use a 2 year old HP netbook now, and it's slowly dying, and I think it will die within the next year, so I need a new laptop sometime.
I don't have any (working) desktops, at home, and everyone basically has their own laptops, so this'll be a standalone computer for me. I'm not generally worried about it being ultraportable and light.
I was wondering if it was worth getting a Macbook Pro 13"... I would mostly use it at home and occasionally bring it to school.
I occasionally use Photoshop and do other graphics work, but it'll mostly be surfing the web, and the occasional word processing.
I'm also considering a Windows computer, it would probably be cheaper, but I'm just liking the overall design, and OS, of the Mac. So, in usability, a Windows machine would work too.
So.. Is it worth it to get a Macbook, or would a Windows machine be better?
As a general rule laptop manufactures besides Apple sell bottom of the barrel junk. Their profit margins are around $50 on a $400 laptop so competition is extremely fierce to make the cheapest possible product with everything wrong with it because consumers only look at specs.
Apple is the only laptop manufacturer that makes "high quality" products any more. Even manufactures that claim to be premium are actually just selling complete junk. I've owned several $2000-$4000 laptops (voodoo, HP Envy, ThinkPad, Alienware, Asus, you name a high end laptop manufactuer, I've owned one of their products) and all of them have been cheap garbage and all broke from usually from multiple cost cutting issue in at least a dozen ways (meaning each laptop had a least a dozen critical failures, which is absurd), though I do use my laptops very hard, and put them through hell. I haven't had a single problem with a MacBook by comparison.
A MacBook will be more expensive in the short run but much cheaper in the long run, a windows PC depreciates 90% in 3 years. A Mac depreciates 50%, which is a very important consideration that more than offsets the initial purchase price. Example: $1000 laptop vs $1600 MacBook (identical specs) - Laptop resale = $100 after 3 years, MacBook resale = $800. So the MacBook is actually $100 cheaper in the long run (for a better product).
It's also worth considering that OS X is around twice as efficient compared to Windows so you will have much better battery life. MacBooks are also more efficient than other laptops given the same hardware. I actually compared two computers: a $2000 high end HP laptop and a MacBook with literally identical 1:1 specs, identical battery capacity, identical memory identical CPU & GPU the MacBook used around a third less power simply because the power supply is built for maximum efficiency not the lowest cost (measuring actual power draw during an identical performance test under Windows 7 with the screen turned off)
The upside to OS X is more efficiency and arguably a more intuitive and better interface the downside is less software is compatible with it, but unless you're doing something specialized or advanced you should be fine.
Macs also last longer, people use 6 year old MacBooks left and right with no issue. 3 year old PCs like your HP are going to be on their last legs, because as I mentioned it's a race to the bottom for quality due to slim profit margins. Manufactuers when faced with for example a choice to put fans that are $2 less expensive in their notebook that will wear out and lose lubrication and make clicking noises in a year or put more expensive ones in, will always go for the cheaper route. Because that $2 will increase profit by 4% which is huge.
Apple's profit margin is 10 times what other manufacturers make on laptops and that profit margin makes them make choices that are the OPPOSITE of what bean counters would do. Instead of putting cheaper fans in their notebooks they actually spent millions of dollars using computational fluid dynamics to create an entierly new fan design that has multiple different sized blades to spread the noise across a greater set of frequencies and make their products quieter. All to improve their products a tiny bit. There's actually a good reason why Apple has such good resale value, and it's not their "desirability" and all that other nonsense people tell themselves to try to explain why Apple products are popular. The products they make are popular because they are actually properly built from the ground up.
Another good example of the difference between cost cutting and high quality is the casing, I owned an HP Envy 15 that had a magnesium case so you'd think it would be durable. It was a $3,000 laptop. Besides having countless critical parts fail, a battery nearly explode and other horrible problems, near the end of it's 1.5 year life after all the problems it had, I banged the corner of it against the floor from a low table. The magnesium case shattered because it was a $25 peice of junk that was cast by heating up magnesium grains until they just barley melted together and calling it a day. An entire corner of the computer shattered into a million peices because the thing had no structural integrity at all, the magnesium chassis was just a cheap marketing gimick built like a toys r' us toy. I hit my 15" MacBook Pro in the exact same way, not only did it not shatter into a million peices, but it actually just bent the corner, because it was cut from a solid peice of aluminium, which bends, it doesn't shatter. (I even managed to bend it back).
Anyways, because Apple doesn't discount their products on fire sales and makes high quality products that last years the resale value is very stable and high. I'm actually spending around 3 times less year over year buying MacBooks for the same specs than I was spending with any other manufacturer just because I didn't lose all my money when I was done with the computer on resale value, and that's not even counting the price difference in repair costs after the warranty expires or replacement batteries in warranty due to poor battery design, which added up to a few hundred per notebook. I haven't had to deal with paying for a repair or a new battery since switching to Macbooks.
The other benefit of MacBooks is that if they do break, you can bring them to hundreds of local Apple stores and they will usually be able to fix them next day or they will air mail them to get fixed in 5 days. If you ever have had to fix a computer you know the warranty service of companies like HP or Dell is ridiculous and incredibly drawn out for up to two months and unprofessional. They just don't care, and why should they?
If you're a Windows user like I am you can also instal Windows on a Mac with great results. I need Windows for the work I do, but I only use Macs, so I currently have 3 Macs with 1 running OS X and 2 running windows and everything works really well. In fact it's better than running windows alone because I can use OS X as my recovery and back up environment which is great because windows back ups are so poorly done with any solution I've found. Under OS X using winclone I can restore an entire MacBook Bootcamp setup in 5 minutes. You couldn't even dream of getting results like that with any other back up restore environment. Trust me I've tried using Windows PE back up environment or linux ones with clones of the partition, they are ridiculously flakey. OS X is by far the most ideal environment to deploy a windows instalation. Especially to disimilar hardware such as when upgrading.
I use a MacBook Air that runs OS X only, which lets me leverage to advantages of OS X. It's great, and lasts 2-3 times longer than the windows alternative I was using before on battery. I get 7 hours using it hard with 30 tabs open and some business software.
To answer your question though it's always worth it to get a MacBook in the long run. Even if the software isn't best for what you want, the reliability and resale value are more than worth it and most people don't realize that. I would do whatever you can to get a MacBook instead of any other laptop, and only get anything else as an absolute last resort. In the long run a PC will be much more expensive, in time money and effort, even if you're running windows. You would still be using your old laptop to this day without any problems if it were a MacBook and could have sold it for several hundred bucks vs nothing or next to nothing. Especially because Apple offers software upgrades, support and even 3 year warranties for products so they stand behind them long after you've bought them.