Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Mark Stone

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Mar 20, 2022
497
552
In its case.
Today I was “babysitting” my 9-year-old grandson. I set my iPhone 13 next to me on the table. He walked up, and in a quick motion, picked it up and pointed the screen in my direction - I glanced at the phone (just a natural response) - it unlocks - and he, walking away, says “Thanks Apa, I just wanted to look at some YouTube Videos”.

I think I’m going back to a PIN.
 
Today I was “babysitting” my 9-year-old grandson. I set my iPhone 13 next to me on the table. He walked up, and in a quick motion, picked it up and pointed the screen in my direction - I glanced at the phone (just a natural response) - it unlocks - and he, walking away, says “Thanks Apa, I just wanted to look at some YouTube Videos”.

I think I’m going back to a PIN.
Next time close your eyes.
 
Today I was “babysitting” my 9-year-old grandson. I set my iPhone 13 next to me on the table. He walked up, and in a quick motion, picked it up and pointed the screen in my direction - I glanced at the phone (just a natural response) - it unlocks - and he, walking away, says “Thanks Apa, I just wanted to look at some YouTube Videos”.

I think I’m going back to a PIN.
Thats why TouchID is ways better.
 
Face ID is terrible and a big step backwards in both security and convenience. I hate it.
Face ID is the most secure method? In what way is it less secure? You can be forced to look at a screen the same as you can be forced to use your fingerprint with Touch ID.
With regards to the OP's example - simply don't leave your phone lying around?! Solves the problem...
 
You can be forced to look at a screen the same as you can be forced to use your fingerprint with Touch ID.

The 9-year-old in question was savvy — pointed the phone at his grandpa and unlocked the device. Didn't force anything.

The grandson, however, would be hard pressed to get grandpa's fingerprint without his explicit cooperation! He certainly couldn't “force” him to do it.

So, in that case, Face ID is definitely less secure! 😎

Picture a pickpocket or hold-up in winter… they could grab the phone and do exactly what the youngster did. Quick and easy. However, getting someone to take off their glove or mitten, ensuring their finger is lined up on the Touch ID scanner, and confirming that it worked would take time. It would draw attention, or could lead to the phone being grabbed back.

So, even in that hypothetical, Touch ID would be more secure…

OTOH, given that many feel that Face ID is less accurate, and on older phones doesn’t work if the owner has a mask on, that could make *it* more secure! 😎
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pro_the_legend
My eldest daughter could open my youngest daughter's iPhone with Face ID. Apple also frequently suggests that they are the same person in Photos. I don't believe they are very similar in appearance, not for us humans anyway. But Face ID is very convenient and our leading Bank ID app here in Sweden accepts it fully. That's good enough for me, since I also have a physical control of my iPhone.
 
The 9-year-old in question was savvy — pointed the phone at his grandpa and unlocked the device. Didn't force anything.

The grandson, however, would be hard pressed to get grandpa's fingerprint without his explicit cooperation! He certainly couldn't “force” him to do it.

So, in that case, Face ID is definitely less secure! 😎

Picture a pickpocket or hold-up in winter… they could grab the phone and do exactly what the youngster did. Quick and easy. However, getting someone to take off their glove or mitten, ensuring their finger is lined up on the Touch ID scanner, and confirming that it worked would take time. It would draw attention, or could lead to the phone being grabbed back.

So, even in that hypothetical, Touch ID would be more secure…

OTOH, given that many feel that Face ID is less accurate, and on older phones doesn’t work if the owner has a mask on, that could make *it* more secure! 😎
I keep my phone in my front pocket so sticking your hand in there would only get multiple punches in the face as a response...
 
Today I was “babysitting” my 9-year-old grandson. I set my iPhone 13 next to me on the table. He walked up, and in a quick motion, picked it up and pointed the screen in my direction - I glanced at the phone (just a natural response) - it unlocks - and he, walking away, says “Thanks Apa, I just wanted to look at some YouTube Videos”.

I think I’m going back to a PIN.
Face ID is not a security feature. It is a convenience feature. The pin is the only actual security.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pro_the_legend
Today I was “babysitting” my 9-year-old grandson. I set my iPhone 13 next to me on the table. He walked up, and in a quick motion, picked it up and pointed the screen in my direction - I glanced at the phone (just a natural response) - it unlocks - and he, walking away, says “Thanks Apa, I just wanted to look at some YouTube Videos”.

I think I’m going back to a PIN.
Did you have "require attention" turned on?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Alex Cai
Face ID is the most secure method? In what way is it less secure? You can be forced to look at a screen the same as you can be forced to use your fingerprint with Touch ID.
With regards to the OP's example - simply don't leave your phone lying around?! Solves the problem...
But it is much easier for somebody to hold a phone at your face than to pull your thumb to the home button
 
TouchID cannot protect you if you are asleep or knocked out or unaware. With FaceID you can turn on "require attention" and it would not work if someone points it at you while you are asleep.
Tru, Face ID is more secure in these scenarios
 
Physical security is the foundation upon which all other security rests.

If you don’t physically control the device, it’s not secure.

There are certainly situations in which it’s not safe to assume the phone can be physically controlled sufficiently to trust biometrics like FaceID or TouchID. It’s not even hard to imagine fairly ordinary people wanting to turn off those features on occasion, such as when going through customs in a country whose government you don’t exactly trust.

But, overwhelmingly, for almost everybody virtually all the time, maintaining physical control of the phone to the extent that biometrics are a reasonable unlocking mechanism is pretty much a given.

Worried about your grandkids unlocking your phone? Apply whatever discipline you would if you caught them stealing cookies from the cookie jar. (A simple, “Hey, that’s seriously not cool. Hand the phone back, and you can forget about ‘borrowing’ my phone for the rest of the trip” would probably do it in this case; if not, that’s between you and the parents.)

b&
 
If you can anticipate that you’ll be in a situation where this is a problem, give your phone a quick squeeze (sleep button + volume up or down) until the “Slide to power off” screen appears (no need to actually power off). The next unlock will require a PIN.
 
When you let kids do whatever they want to your phone then no, it’s not secure. Kids are funny, though.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.