My beloved PowerMac G5 is nearing the end of it's useful life as I really need an Intel Processor to be able to test in Windows, but as much as I'd love a new Mac Pro it's just not happening at the current prices.
It suddenly occurred to me through that my Macbook Pro may actually be equally or even more capable than my PowerMac? I bought it secondhand for use in the occasional meeting and it hasn't had much use but I've found a gizmo which would mean I could run my two 20" displays from the Macbook Pro, and in this set-up I could easily use it practically as my everyday machine.
So enough of the rambling, my question to you brainy people, would my Macbook Pro (17" 2.33 Ghz Core 2 Duo, 3GB RAM, Model ID 2,1) run equally fast or better than my PowerMac (G5 Dual 2.3 Processor, 4.5GB RAM) in everyday use? I guess running mainly Adobe apps but also VMware Fusion. 3GB RAM seems pretty puny? Are Notebooks really designed to be on all day everyday, would it overheat?
Thanks for any input
It suddenly occurred to me through that my Macbook Pro may actually be equally or even more capable than my PowerMac? I bought it secondhand for use in the occasional meeting and it hasn't had much use but I've found a gizmo which would mean I could run my two 20" displays from the Macbook Pro, and in this set-up I could easily use it practically as my everyday machine.
So enough of the rambling, my question to you brainy people, would my Macbook Pro (17" 2.33 Ghz Core 2 Duo, 3GB RAM, Model ID 2,1) run equally fast or better than my PowerMac (G5 Dual 2.3 Processor, 4.5GB RAM) in everyday use? I guess running mainly Adobe apps but also VMware Fusion. 3GB RAM seems pretty puny? Are Notebooks really designed to be on all day everyday, would it overheat?
Thanks for any input