Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

ramblintoad

macrumors member
Original poster
Jun 9, 2008
50
0
I returned my first gen iphone today since I bought it 11 days ago, and when I was asking the store clerk there she mentioned that the $200 price is probably a subsidy, so I would have to wait until I can upgrade my plan. Is this true, or did she not know what she was talking about?
 
I returned my first gen iphone today since I bought it 11 days ago, and when I was asking the store clerk there she mentioned that the $200 price is probably a subsidy, so I would have to wait until I can upgrade my plan. Is this true, or did she not know what she was talking about?

It is technically a subsidy, but it's automatic for anyone signing up for a new iPhone contract. There is no way to get the phone "unsubsidized."
 
I returned my first gen iphone today since I bought it 11 days ago, and when I was asking the store clerk there she mentioned that the $200 price is probably a subsidy, so I would have to wait until I can upgrade my plan. Is this true, or did she not know what she was talking about?

It's NOT a subsidy. It's the RETAIL pricing as said by Jobs in his keynote.
 
It's NOT a subsidy. It's the RETAIL pricing as said by Jobs in his keynote.

So a 3G iPhone with aGPS costs $199 and that price isn't subsidised somehow! Wow they're really ripping us off on the iPod Touch and iPod Nano then
 
There is no way this isnt a subsidy!

The only reason to force the signing of a contract before you leave the store would be because AT&T is giving apple the other $200 they are loosing from the initial sale! If people were able to take the phone home and unlock it Apple would loose money!
 
Yes, NO WAY is a next gen iPhone with extra features only $200.

Anyone that believes otherwise is a total moron..

I agree. This is the way Apple is doing it now. If they want compete with RIM they have to go head to head. The only difference between this and a regular "subsidy" is that the first iPhone was special (in its pricing) and this phone is going a more traditional pricing route. So they have to give the new iPhone for that price to existing owners, new customers, and those eligible for an upgrade. (Maybe those ineligible for upgrade will get the pricing too) Its all to get you to pay them at least $80 a month. They could give it away for free and still make money.

In short, YES.
 
It's NOT a subsidy. It's the RETAIL pricing as said by Jobs in his keynote.

I though he said we worked with the carrier to bring you the phone at a lower price.

Is Apple including the entire subsidy they get from AT&T in the price, maybe, maybe not.

Don't know.

May be more up front with the new deal and the dropping of the old AT&T contract revenue sharing.

AT&T also warned that it will take an earnings hit due to the pricing because new subsidies it agreed to pay will produce the iPhone price cut — not a reduction from Apple.
 
Read the press release on the AT&T website. They clearly state this is "subsidized pricing."
 
It's...not quite a subsidy. In fact, it's kinda the opposite - Apple used to charge AT&T $200 for each iPhone sold, but with the 3G iPhone, they aren't. So really it's just a cheaper phone. Having said that, it's impossible to buy one without signing a 2 year contract, just like the old iPhone.
 
Read the press release on the AT&T website. They clearly state this is "subsidized pricing."

+1

"The new agreement between Apple and AT&T eliminates the revenue-sharing model under which AT&T shared a portion of monthly service revenue with Apple. Under the revised agreement, which is consistent with traditional equipment manufacturer-carrier arrangements, there is no revenue sharing ..."

"In the near term, AT&T anticipates that the new agreement will likely result in some pressure on margins and earnings, reflecting the costs of subsidized device pricing, which, in turn, is expected to drive increased subscriber volumes."

Apple has gone to what they originally made fun of: The traditional phone pricing structure.
 
It's NOT a subsidy. It's the RETAIL pricing as said by Jobs in his keynote.

Yeah, you go on believing that...until July comes and they tell you that it costs $399 and $499 and that you're getting your rebate when you activate...

Btw, my statement above pretty much argues it as a base price. Its a subsidy cause its technically $399. But its base price cause you can't buy it without signing the contract. Its just like all the other 2 year contract phone prices.

But if you ask att whether its base price, they should tell you base is $399. Just its an instant rebate.
 
Yeah, you go on believing that...until July comes and they tell you that it costs $399 and $499 and that you're getting your rebate when you activate...

I'd be ok with 399 if I didn't need a contract....canada is looking three years
 
There's got to be a way to get my hands on an iPhone without getting a contract. I wonder if the cancellation fees would be over $200...if not I would just buy an iPhone and cancel and it'd be like buying the old iPhone.

My current iPhone is on T-Mobile.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.