Please bear with me during this rambling post... 
I need a new laptop for:
Work (general office stuff, engineering, web) and it should be linux compatible, as that's what we use at the office
Home (Image editting (Lightroom), general web browsing, almost no games)
I'm tired of being my own sysadmin for my laptop and work PC. Therefore would like a system that integrates ease of use, Linux/unix compability (ssh, xterm, openvpn) and good portability, so that i can use a single machine for work, home and some traveling around.
Have been using Windows 7 RC and am very pleased with it on my Thinkpad T60. a 14", stylish (IMO) black workhorse weighing in at 2.2kg.
I'm able to do simple linux things (recompile kernel to include ethernet drivers, occassional compile from source), but the amount of hassle is draining me now that I'm on the wrong side of 30. Moreover, in Linux things don't just work like they do in the Windows arena.
I have been reading the boards here with interest. Overall my brain says to go with the new Thinkpad T400S (1.75kg, 1440x900 matte display, good keyboard (spill proof), rugged design, attractive (eye of the beholder), priced around the cost of a MBP 15" - integrated gfx model)
I'm happy with most things Windows now that 7 is out, except unix compatiblity, therefore Im considering the MBP 15" (due to its matte option), but have the following reservations, and would be itnerested in other people's opinions:
1. Is the 15", being 5cm wider than the current laptop, too big for travel, cafe's etc?
2. Reliability does seem worse than other brands. Sure Apple have great customer care, but if I look at the premium one pays for a Thinkpad these things you can throw around and they keep on working, is this something i should consider - especially if I'm out in the field doing measurements?
3. I'm not sure if I can live with the facist apple regime... No matte option for 13", sharp edges on the Al macbook, iTunes and Quicktime are de facto forced on you, one-button mice, pretty but not great keyboards, and the general Steve-Jobs-is-God mentality that pervades much of the mac community. So-called 'Think-differently' and yet all hardware choices are made by Apple, all GUI choices are made by Apple etc.
There is an assumption that Macs are uncrashable and just work, however looking at the amount of program incompatibilities with SL this seems like an outright misrepresentation. Regarding security, if I look at my non-admin setup in Windows 7 then apart from the market share issue, I don't see why there should be an a priori difference in that respect either.
I think it comes down to this: the Thinkpad T400S provides everything I need hardware-wise (size, weight, screen, reliability) - more so than a MBP 15". Even software-wise I'm only considering Apple due to its unix basis, yet I'm having a hard time dealing with the Mac-mentality.
Could anyone provide me with some arguements that I could justify a MBP decision to myself?
regards,
Laurens
I need a new laptop for:
Work (general office stuff, engineering, web) and it should be linux compatible, as that's what we use at the office
Home (Image editting (Lightroom), general web browsing, almost no games)
I'm tired of being my own sysadmin for my laptop and work PC. Therefore would like a system that integrates ease of use, Linux/unix compability (ssh, xterm, openvpn) and good portability, so that i can use a single machine for work, home and some traveling around.
Have been using Windows 7 RC and am very pleased with it on my Thinkpad T60. a 14", stylish (IMO) black workhorse weighing in at 2.2kg.
I'm able to do simple linux things (recompile kernel to include ethernet drivers, occassional compile from source), but the amount of hassle is draining me now that I'm on the wrong side of 30. Moreover, in Linux things don't just work like they do in the Windows arena.
I have been reading the boards here with interest. Overall my brain says to go with the new Thinkpad T400S (1.75kg, 1440x900 matte display, good keyboard (spill proof), rugged design, attractive (eye of the beholder), priced around the cost of a MBP 15" - integrated gfx model)
I'm happy with most things Windows now that 7 is out, except unix compatiblity, therefore Im considering the MBP 15" (due to its matte option), but have the following reservations, and would be itnerested in other people's opinions:
1. Is the 15", being 5cm wider than the current laptop, too big for travel, cafe's etc?
2. Reliability does seem worse than other brands. Sure Apple have great customer care, but if I look at the premium one pays for a Thinkpad these things you can throw around and they keep on working, is this something i should consider - especially if I'm out in the field doing measurements?
3. I'm not sure if I can live with the facist apple regime... No matte option for 13", sharp edges on the Al macbook, iTunes and Quicktime are de facto forced on you, one-button mice, pretty but not great keyboards, and the general Steve-Jobs-is-God mentality that pervades much of the mac community. So-called 'Think-differently' and yet all hardware choices are made by Apple, all GUI choices are made by Apple etc.
There is an assumption that Macs are uncrashable and just work, however looking at the amount of program incompatibilities with SL this seems like an outright misrepresentation. Regarding security, if I look at my non-admin setup in Windows 7 then apart from the market share issue, I don't see why there should be an a priori difference in that respect either.
I think it comes down to this: the Thinkpad T400S provides everything I need hardware-wise (size, weight, screen, reliability) - more so than a MBP 15". Even software-wise I'm only considering Apple due to its unix basis, yet I'm having a hard time dealing with the Mac-mentality.
Could anyone provide me with some arguements that I could justify a MBP decision to myself?
regards,
Laurens