Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Booju16

macrumors member
Original poster
Jun 15, 2010
86
0
Gotham City, NY
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_5 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8L1 Safari/6533.18.5)

Curious...
 
AT&T's HSPA+ network is faster than Sprint's WiMax network.
Hell, T-Mobile's HSPA+ network smokes them both.

AT&T's LTE network is supposed to be faster than Verizon's but it hasn't been put through any real world paces yet.

But the report claims sprint get's 4-5 Mbps download rates. This is pathetic.
I'm on AT&T's HSPA (not +) network here in Phoenix and I get 4 Mbps download rates.
Much faster when I go downtown and hop on their HSPA+ network.
 
Last edited:
rjohnstone said:
AT&T's LTE network is supposed to be faster than Verizon's but it hasn't been put through any real world paces yet.

I don't think that's true. From my understanding they are using the same technology and equipment from the same sources, so differences would only be in implementation. That's why in Houston AT&T has great LTE speeds because they have 20Mhz band whereas in Chicago it is much slower because they only have 10Mhz band.
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.