I'd say no, because its competing for a different market demographic.oes Lenovo need to redesign the P series
The P1 is a much closer MBP equivalent, but the P53 has its place. It's a much thicker, heavier machine that will probably run the same CPU 10-15% faster. I saw one datapoint(The Verge) that the new MBP with the 2.4 gHz i9 settles in at about 3.2 -3.3 gHz after sustained Cinebench. It runs faster to begin with and in bursts, but if you're encoding all day, it'll go about 3.2 -3.3 on all cores. For comparison, I believe that a 27" iMac with the 9900K hits about 4.2 or 4.3 gHz under similar conditions - the processor turbo is the same, but the iMac has a higher TDP, more power delivery and more cooling. The P53 might settle in between 3.4 and 3.7 gHz. More like an MBP than an iMac, but in between.
Lenovo also puts a significantly more powerful GPU into the P53, compared either to what Apple uses in the 16" MBP or to what Lenovo themselves use in the P1. The P53 can take up to a Quadro RTX 5000 (the workstation cousin of a Mobile GeForce RTX 2080), while the P1 uses a Quadro T2000 (related to a GeForce 1650). The Radeon 5500 in the Mac benchmarks between a 1650 and a 16660 in NVidia terms.
Razer crams the RTX 5000 (or its GeForce equivalent in other configurations) into a machine about half a pound heavier than the Mac, and nearly a pound lighter than the P53, but it compromises battery life and other components.
The other advantage to the P53 is expansion. It'll take 128 GB of RAM (for a price, of course), and it has every port you might want, including wired Ethernet. While it has 2 NVMe SSD slots and (in some configurations) a third drive bay that seems to take both SATA and PCIe drives, the only way to get it to Apple's 8 TB maximum storage uses three drives, the largest of which is SATA and 20% the speed of the Apple SSD. Such a configuration is also even more expensive than even a maxed-out MBP, and not officially supported. There's no reason it shouldn't work, but Lenovo lists the maximum storage capacity as 6 TB and doesn't sell SATA drives >2TB. Oddly, the SATA bay seems to disappear with 8-core processors - this could just be a glitch in Lenovo's configuration engine?
The P1 is a much closer MBP equivalent, but the P53 has its place. It's a much thicker, heavier machine that will probably run the same CPU 10-15% faster. I saw one datapoint(The Verge) that the new MBP with the 2.4 gHz i9 settles in at about 3.2 -3.3 gHz after sustained Cinebench. It runs faster to begin with and in bursts, but if you're encoding all day, it'll go about 3.2 -3.3 on all cores. For comparison, I believe that a 27" iMac with the 9900K hits about 4.2 or 4.3 gHz under similar conditions - the processor turbo is the same, but the iMac has a higher TDP, more power delivery and more cooling. The P53 might settle in between 3.4 and 3.7 gHz. More like an MBP than an iMac, but in between.
Lenovo also puts a significantly more powerful GPU into the P53, compared either to what Apple uses in the 16" MBP or to what Lenovo themselves use in the P1. The P53 can take up to a Quadro RTX 5000 (the workstation cousin of a Mobile GeForce RTX 2080), while the P1 uses a Quadro T2000 (related to a GeForce 1650). The Radeon 5500 in the Mac benchmarks between a 1650 and a 16660 in NVidia terms.
Razer crams the RTX 5000 (or its GeForce equivalent in other configurations) into a machine about half a pound heavier than the Mac, and nearly a pound lighter than the P53, but it compromises battery life and other components.
The other advantage to the P53 is expansion. It'll take 128 GB of RAM (for a price, of course), and it has every port you might want, including wired Ethernet. While it has 2 NVMe SSD slots and (in some configurations) a third drive bay that seems to take both SATA and PCIe drives, the only way to get it to Apple's 8 TB maximum storage uses three drives, the largest of which is SATA and 20% the speed of the Apple SSD. Such a configuration is also even more expensive than even a maxed-out MBP, and not officially supported. There's no reason it shouldn't work, but Lenovo lists the maximum storage capacity as 6 TB and doesn't sell SATA drives >2TB. Oddly, the SATA bay seems to disappear with 8-core processors - this could just be a glitch in Lenovo's configuration engine?
Sure. Since 90+% of users use Windows and the Lenovo runs Windows better than the MBP.