Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

oxband

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Sep 10, 2009
333
4
I have external hard drives I use for backups and for film editing. Is there any kind of maintenance worth doing for them? Repair disk and/or permissions? Something else? Just curious. Some are bootable and some are not.
 
I have external hard drives I use for backups and for film editing. Is there any kind of maintenance worth doing for them? Repair disk and/or permissions? Something else? Just curious. Some are bootable and some are not.

If you are not having any issues then you should be good to go. There really isn't any maintenance required for external hard drives. Make sure you backup the important data that's on the external hard drive.
 
I have external hard drives I use for backups and for film editing. Is there any kind of maintenance worth doing for them? Repair disk and/or permissions? Something else? Just curious. Some are bootable and some are not.

The bootable drives should be tested to verify that you can run the system from them. Any data stored on externals needs to be backed up.
 
If they are platter-based hard drives, an occasional defragmentation would be useful.

This would apply particularly if you use the drives with apps that like large blocks of contiguous free space (for extended disk writes) -- such as film/video editing.

You should probably run Disk Utility's "repair disk" function on them now and then, as well. And run "repair permissions" on those drives which are bootable.
 
Repair permissions is generally unneeded and considered to be voodoo. You see it bandied around the forums a lot here, as some kind of universal solution to misbehaving hardware/software/solar flare activity.

In reality, it's an old legacy feature from back in the day when you could dual-boot OS X and OS 9 on the same Mac. OS 9 had no concept of unix-style file permissions, and it could occasionally muck up the permissions on OS X HFS+ filesystems. Running "Repair Disk Permissions" just resets file/directory permissions to match their initial settings. Each app you install via a .pkg file leaves a .bom (bill-of-materials) file in /var/db/receipts. Repair permissions looks at each of those receipts and resets the application's file permissions accordingly.

The thing is that some applications do change their file permissions after they've been run. Or, you may have a valid reason for changing them yourself. I've seen instances where "repairing" permissions actually broke things by denying access to shared files.

The problem is in the wording. "Repair" implies that something is broken, and isn't repairing always a good thing to do? Reset file permissions might be a better wording.

In any case, if you aren't installing applications via .pkg files to the external drives, you definitely don't need to bother w/repair permissions ... and if you are installing apps there, you probably *still* don't need to bother with it.

Source: worked as an Apple tech and unix sysadmin for a very long time, and I am one with disk permissions :)

But if you don't believe me, here's John Gruber's take on it:

http://daringfireball.net/2006/04/repair_permissions_voodoo
 
  • Like
Reactions: ratsg
Repair permissions is generally unneeded and considered to be voodoo. You see it bandied around the forums a lot here, as some kind of universal solution to misbehaving hardware/software/solar flare activity.

In reality, it's an old legacy feature from back in the day when you could dual-boot OS X and OS 9 on the same Mac. OS 9 had no concept of unix-style file permissions, and it could occasionally muck up the permissions on OS X HFS+ filesystems. Running "Repair Disk Permissions" just resets file/directory permissions to match their initial settings.

+1

I have been using OS X since the 10.0 beta's, and I have never seen it repair anything.

It continues to amaze me at the level this command has been elevated to for something which is, for all essential purposes for 10.5 and later systems, useless.

I got into an online disagreement probably around a year ago with a gentleman who was making outrageous about the repair capabilities of the repair disk permissions command.

I finally had to go hunt it down myself. I found an Apple link which has expired, but had been archived in the Wayback Machine and was still available there. It stated pretty much verbatim what your article says.

The disk repair permissions was for use on dual boot systems, as the old Mac OS 9 had no concept of unix drive permissions and would occasionally mess them up.

Unless someone has some magic tool, and please share if you do I still have Classic apps I use, that allows 10.5 and later systems to boot Classic and/or dual boot, repair disk permission really serves no real purpose in the current Mac OS X world.
 
Some people repair, or recommend repairing permissions for situations where it isn't appropriate. Repairing permissions only addresses very specific issues. It is not a "cure all" or a general performance enhancer, and doesn't need to be done on a regular basis. It also doesn't address permissions problems with your files or 3rd party apps.
Disk Utility repairs the permissions for files installed by the Mac OS X Installer, Software Update, or an Apple software installer. It doesn’t repair permissions for your documents, your home folder, and third-party applications.

You can verify or repair permissions only on a disk with Mac OS X installed.
Does Disk Utility check permissions on all files?

Files that aren't installed as part of an Apple-originated installer package are not listed in a receipt and therefore are not checked. For example, if you install an application using a non-Apple installer application, or by copying it from a disk image, network volume, or other disk instead of installing it via Installer, a receipt file isn't created. This is expected. Some applications are designed to be installed in one of those ways.

Also, certain files whose permissions can be changed during normal usage without affecting their function are intentionally not checked.
There are times when repairing permissions is appropriate. To do so, here are the instructions:
If repairing permissions results in error messages, some of these messages can be ignored and should be no cause for concern.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.